Miller v. Haen Constructors, et al.

LAW AND MOTION CALENDAR JULY 10, 2026

3. MILLER v. HAEN CONSTRUCTORS, ET AL., 25CV2697

(A) Defendant Haen Constructors’ Motion to Compel

(B) Defendant Thomas Haen’s Motion to Compel

(C) Defendant Robert Haen’s Motion to Compel

On May 29, 2026, defendants Haen Constructors, Thomas Haen, and Robert Haen

(collectively, “defendants”), each filed a separate motion to compel plaintiff Laura

Miller’s (“plaintiff”) verified responses to each defendant’s Form Interrogatories, Special

Interrogatories, and Request for Production, all Set One. Each defendant’s motion

includes a request for monetary sanctions against plaintiff in the amount of $1,025.00.

On June 26, 2026, plaintiff filed a notice of non-opposition to the motions to compel

verified responses without objections; however, plaintiff requests that the court deny all

requests for monetary sanctions.

Defendants filed no reply.

Based on plaintiff’s non-opposition, the court will grant each of the three

defendant’s motions to compel. The court denies each of the requests for monetary

sanctions.

TENTATIVE RULING # 3:

DEFENDANT HAEN CONSTRUCTORS’ MOTION TO COMPEL: THE MOTION TO COMPEL

IS GRANTED IN PART. WITHIN 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SERVICE OF THE NOTICE

OF ENTRY OF ORDER, PLAINTIFF LAURA MILLER SHALL SERVE VERIFIED RESPONSES

WITHOUT OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT HAEN CONSTRUCTORS’ FORM

INTERROGATORIES, SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION,

ALL SET ONE. THE COURT DENIES THE REQUEST FOR A MONETARY SANCTION.

DEFENDANT THOMAS HAEN’S MOTION TO COMPEL: THE MOTION TO COMPEL IS GRANTED IN PART. WITHIN 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SERVICE OF THE NOTICE OF

LAW AND MOTION CALENDAR JULY 10, 2026

ENTRY OF ORDER, PLAINTIFF LAURA MILLER SHALL SERVE VERIFIED RESPONSES

WITHOUT OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT THOMAS HAEN’S FORM INTERROGATORIES,

SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION, ALL SET ONE. THE

COURT DENIES THE REQUEST FOR A MONETARY SANCTION.

DEFENDANT ROBERT HAEN’S MOTION TO COMPEL: THE MOTION TO COMPEL IS GRANTED IN PART. WITHIN 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SERVICE OF THE NOTICE OF

ENTRY OF ORDER, PLAINTIFF LAURA MILLER SHALL SERVE VERIFIED RESPONSES

WITHOUT OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT ROBERT HAEN’S FORM INTERROGATORIES, SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION, ALL SET ONE. THE

COURT DENIES THE REQUEST FOR A MONETARY SANCTION.

NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD (LEWIS v. SUPERIOR COURT (1999) 19

CAL.4TH 1232, 1247), UNLESS A NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPEAR AND REQUEST FOR

ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S

WEBSITE OR BY TELEPHONE TO THE COURT AT (530) 573-3042 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE

DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF AN INTENT TO

APPEAR MUST BE MADE BY TELEPHONE OR IN PERSON. PROOF OF SERVICE OF SAID

NOTICE MUST BE FILED PRIOR TO OR AT THE HEARING.