| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4
5) 6 JOHN PAUL AGUIRRE,) Case Number: FDI-22-796849) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: April 16, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 DALE ANTHONY AGUIRRE,) Department: 404) 10 Respondent) Presiding: AI MORI) 11) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS 13 TENTATIVE RULING 14 Having read and considered the pleadings, declarations, and other evidence submitted in this matter, the 15 Court makes the following findings and orders: 16 A. Procedural History 17 1) Petitioner John Paul Aguirre and Respondent Dale Anthony Aguirre married on 10/24/2015 and 18 separated on 5/18/2022, for a marriage of 6 years and 6 months.
The parties have two minor 19 children, Ava (DOB: 7/26/2019, age 6) and Ace (DOB: 3/31/2021, age 5). Petitioner is self- 20 represented, although Respondent states Petitioner uses the attorneys at Van Voorhis & Sosna 21 LLP as consultants. Respondent is represented by attorney Vanessa Hierbaum and her firm. 22 2) On 7/25/2024, a Judgment of Dissolution was entered, which incorporates the parties’ Marital 23 Settlement Agreement. The Judgment provides in pertinent part: 24 a. The parties are bound by a prenuptial agreement executed on 10/1/2015. 25 b.
The Court’s jurisdiction to award spousal support to either party is terminated. 26 c. The child custody and visitation Stipulations and Orders filed 7/13/2023, 9/29/2023, and 27 12/7/2023 shall remain in full force and effect. 28 d. Effective 1/1/2024, Petitioner shall pay Respondent base guideline child support of 29 $3,965 per month pursuant to the attached Dissomaster report (which is based on the
1 parties sharing 50% time of their children, Petitioner earning $36,666 per month in base 2 income, and Respondent earning $1,950 per month in base income). 3 e. Both parties are subject to a Smith / Ostler child support order. 4 f. The parties shall share equally unreimbursed healthcare expenses for the children. 5 g. Respondent shall notify Petitioner of any new employment within one week of entering 6 into any employment agreement and child support shall be modifiable retroactively to the 7 start date of Respondent’s new employment. 8 h.
Petitioner shall pay Respondent $32,500 as a contribution to Respondent’s attorney’s fees 9 and costs “incurred to date in this proceeding.” 10 3) The parties signed their marital settlement agreement on 4/4/2024. On 3/29/2024, Petitioner filed 11 a Request for Order seeking permission to travel to Mexico with the parties’ children. At the 12 hearing on 6/11/2024, Judge Tong denied Petitioner’s request to travel with the children (see 13 Findings and Order After Hearing filed 7/22/2024). Then, on 4/4/2025, Petitioner filed a Request 14 for Order seeking sole legal and physical custody, alleging that Respondent had a relapse into 15 alcoholism, and requesting an order that their daughter Ava receive an Applied Behavioral 16 Analysis (ABA) assessment.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
At the hearing on 7/10/2025, Judge Costin denied Petitioner’s 17 request to modify custody or visitation, ordered the parties to attend co-parenting counseling, 18 ordered the children attend therapy, and ordered that the ABA assessment of Ava to occur. The 19 Court also set the matter for a review hearing on 11/6/2025. See Findings and Order After 20 Hearing filed 7/24/2025. At the review hearing on 11/6/2025, the Court denied Petitioner’s 21 request to modify the existing parenting schedule, denied Petitioner’s request to reinstate 22 Soberlink alcohol monitoring for Respondent (finding that “Respondent’s testimony regarding his 23 sobriety date and not drinking is credible), ordered that the ABA treatment commence for Ava 24 through the end of the 2025-2026 school year, ordered that the parents pursue occupational 25 therapy for Ava, and ordered the children to receive licensed psychotherapy. 26 4) Now on for hearing is Respondent’s Request for Order filed 2/10/2026.
Respondent states the 27 parties’ premarital agreement precluded him from receiving spousal support and, since entry of 28 Judgment, he has been living off of his assets and child support. Respondent states he currently 29 has no income following a period of disability (his disability status expired on 2/1/2026), is
1 looking for work, and is in significant debt. Respondent also states he has created an LLC for 2 entrepreneurial endeavors including consulting work. Respondent asks the Court to: 3 a. Award him $65,000 in need-based attorney’s fees and costs for fees and costs incurred to 4 respond to and appear at the hearings for Petitioner’s 3/29/2024 Request for Order and 5 4/4/2025 Request for Order; 6 b. Modify the current child support order to reflect that he currently has no income; 7 c. Modify the current child support order to require that the parties share unreimbursed 8 healthcare expenses for the children in proportion to their incomes; 9 d.
Order Petitioner to provide his paystub documenting his bonus when he pays bonus 10 support. 11 5) On 2/10/2026, Respondent filed an Income and Expense Declaration. Respondent states that he is 12 49 years old and has a high school degree. Respondent listed no income. Respondent states that 13 his monthly expenses total $8,912. Respondent states he has $13,100 in cash savings, $0 in 14 investments, and $20,000 in real property. Respondent states that he owes $64,903 in credit card 15 debt. Respondent states he has paid his attorney $159,428 in attorney’s fees and costs to date, 16 including $61,668 “since financial settlement in 4/4/2024,” using borrowed funds and an early 17 withdrawal from his 401(k). 18 6) On 2/10/2026, Respondent’s attorney filed a declaration.
Respondent’s attorney states, “The bulk 19 of Respondent’s fees and costs before and after the parties settled the financial issues on April 4, 20 2024, were incurred related to the custody proceedings. All of Respondent’s attorney’s fees and 21 costs since April 4, 2024 through December 31, 2025, were incurred related to custody 22 proceedings initiated by Petitioner. All the professional time and costs expended on Respondent’s 23 behalf was reasonable and necessary to defend [Respondent] in these proceedings, represent what 24 [Respondent] believes to be the best interest of the children and assist him in addressing custody- 25 related matters.” 26 7) On 3/19/2026, Respondent filed an Amendment to Request for Order to clarify that he is 27 requesting a modification of the current child support orders including add-ons and an order that 28 Petitioner provide his paystub documenting his bonus when he pays bonus support and to note 29
1 that he inadvertently did not mention those requests in the FL-300 form (although these requests 2 were set forth in the accompanying declaration). 3 8) On 4/3/2026, Petitioner filed a Responsive Declaration. Petitioner states that since February 2024, 4 he has paid Respondent $470,485 in cash, including $278,152 for a home equity buyout, 5 $159,833.34 in support, and $32,500 in attorney’s fees contributions. Petitioner states Respondent 6 also received $64,833 from his 401(k). Petitioner further states that in 2025, Respondent received 7 $84,240 net in disability payments, $72,259.28 in retirement distributions, $28,571 in ByteDance 8 equity, and $6,815 in tax refunds.
Petitioner states, “This income alone equals $264,857 in 2025.” 9 Petitioner also claims that Respondent spends lavishly, including purchasing two Audi Q5 10 vehicles in cash, residing in a luxury loft apartment, spending on luxury clothing, spending 11 $1,200 - $1,600 per month on food delivery services, retaining an expensive family law firm, and 12 furnishing his residence with high-end furniture. Petitioner also states that Respondent has chosen 13 to work with a partner of an expensive family law firm and filed an ex parte Request for Order on 14 4/23/2025 to reschedule a readiness hearing which the Court denied (see Temporary Emergency 15 Orders filed 4/23/2025), and that Respondent chose to oppose reasonable requests.
Petitioner 16 states that the only savings he can draw from are $967,119.63 in his Empower 401(k), $22,323.77 17 in a Schwab Roth-IRA, and $13,218 in Schwab 529 Plans for our children, “none of which I 18 could draw upon without significant tax penalties.” Petitioner states that Respondent has a long 19 history of earning six figure salaries ($218,742 in 2023, $208,464 in 2022, $145,568 in 2021, and 20 $225,685 in 2020). Petitioner states that Respondent’s gross income for 2024 was $75,648 and 21 his gross income for 2025 was $97,720, and Petitioner asks the Court to impute to Respondent 22 the average of these two figures (i.e., $86,689).
Petitioner also states that while Respondent has 23 incurred $178,000 in attorney’s fees and costs in this matter, he has incurred $77,959 in 24 attorney’s fees “and have remained primarily unrepresented working intermittently with a 25 consulting attorney as needed.” Petitioner states that he owes the following debts: $250,000 SF 26 Fire Credit Union HELOC, $50,000 Empower 401(k) loan, $45,000 American Express personal 27 loan, and $25,000 in Citibank credit balance transfer. Petitioner states he incurred these debts to 28 pay Respondent the agreed-upon marital settlement.
Petitioner asks the Court to: 29 a. Deny Respondent’s request for attorney’s fees in its entirety;
1 b. Deny Respondent’s request to modify child support and impute $86,689 in annual 2 income to Respondent; 3 c. Order Respondent to seek work and provide monthly written proof of job search efforts; 4 d. Order Respondent to pay child support arrears of $28,048.27; 5 e. Order Respondent to reimburse $2,003.85 for unreimbursed medical expenses; and 6 f. Award Respondent sanctions of $1,500 under Family Code section 271. 7 9) On 4/3/2026, Petitioner filed an Income and Expense Declaration. Petitioner states he is 46 years 8 old and has college and masters degrees.
Petitioner states that he currently earns $39,583 per 9 month in base salary and $6,879 per month in bonuses. Petitioner states that he has net rental 10 income of $1,200 per month. Petitioner states that his monthly expenses total $20,298. Petitioner 11 left the section regarding assets completely blank. Petitioner states that he owes $33,002 for a 12 loan against his retirement account. Petitioner left the section which asks him to report how much 13 he has paid in attorney’s fees to date completely blank. 14 10) On 4/9/2026, Respondent filed a Reply Declaration.
Respondent states he has the following 15 health conditions which impact his ability to work: Type II diabetes, chronic fatigue, GI-related 16 issues, candidiasis, and related health complications. Respondent states he has not received 17 disability payments since December 2025 and is not eligible to receive any more payments. 18 Respondent states that despite his health issues, he continues to apply for jobs in the hope that he 19 will be able to return to work once his health improves. Respondent states, “The ‘financial 20 resources’ JP references are largely from the equalizing payment as part of our April 2024 21 Judgment, stock liquidations that is not income available for support.., and one-time early 22 distributions from the retirement account divided as part of our settlement.
These are not ongoing 23 sources of income; I liquidated assets (and will have to pay significant taxes and penalties for 24 doing so), just to pay for ordinary living and medical expenses, housing, and attorney’s fees 25 during the time that I have been unable to work.” Petitioner also states, “JP states I earned 26 $75,658 in 2024 and that he overpaid support. That is incorrect. My 2024 tax return reflects 27 $67,128 in W-2 income, which was from a stock buyback of my Bytedance RSUs. Per our 28 Judgment, the liquidation of these shares shall not be considered income available for child 29 support unless they are sold for more than the value on the date of the vest.
The shares were
1 bought back for the same value they vested at, so this is not income available for support.1 The 2 remaining “income” was for an early withdrawal from retirement to assist with living expenses. 3 For 2025, I did receive disability payment. However, JP also includes an early withdrawal from 4 my 401(k) as income. I had to withdraw those funds in December 2025 to pay for basic living 5 expenses and replenish my retainer to avoid going further into debt. I will be heavily taxed and 6 penalized for this early withdrawal.
This is not recurring income, but rather a one-time 7 withdrawal made out of desperation and necessity to provide for our children. This withdrawal 8 should be treated as income for purposes of calculating ongoing support. As with the Bytedance 9 shares in 2024, the $28,571.34 distribution consists of 112 shares sold for nearly the same as the 10 vesting price ($3.79 more) and 72 shares sold for less than the vesting price ($9.39 less). As such, 11 this is not income available for support.” Respondent further states that Petitioner’s W-2 for 2025 12 shows $771,843 in salary alone and “does not appear to reflect the $164,000 bonus he received in 13 March 2025, the $118,750 bonus he received in December 2025, and the over $82,000 worth of 14 stock he received in March 2026.”
Respondent reiterates his original requests and also asks the 15 Court to: 16 a. Deny Petitioner’s request for support arrears or set the issue for a review hearing in 60 17 days so the parties can meet and confer; and 18 b. Deny Petitioner’s request for sanctions. 19 c. Respondent also states that he is agreeable to paying his share of the medical expenses 20 listed in Petitioner’s Responsive Declaration 21 11) On 4/10/2026, Petitioner filed a Sur Reply. Among other statements made, Petitioner states that 22 his base salary is $475,000 and that his 2025 compensation was inflated by the acquisition of his 23 former company and he received a bonus in December 2025 that he would normally have 24 received in March 2026.
Petitioner states he will not receive another corresponding bonus in 25 2026. Petitioner further states that he had “long-term cash awards that vested over three years and 26 were paid in March 2025 and March 2026. These were not ordinary recurring annual 27 compensation items.” 28 B. Findings and Order 29 1) Effective immediately, Respondent shall abide by the attached Seek Work Order.
1 2) The Court will not impute Respondent with income at this time, but the Court’s jurisdiction to 2 review whether to impute income is reserved for the next hearing date. 3 3) The Court finds that the increase in Petitioner’s income as well as the loss of disability income for 4 Respondent are material changes in circumstance warranting a modification of child support. 5 4) Effective 2/10/2026 (the date Respondent filed his Request for Order), in accordance with the 6 XSpouse calculation attached hereto and incorporated herein, Petitioner shall pay to Respondent 7 $5,425 per month in base guideline child support.
Commencing 5/1/2026, base child support shall 8 be paid by the 1st of the month. 9 5) Effective 2/10/2026, in addition to the monthly child support payment set forth above, each party 10 shall pay as additional child support to the other party a portion of any and all additional gross 11 income received in excess of the amount set forth in XSpouse calculation ($475,000 per year in 12 salary income for Petitioner and $0 in salary income for Respondent), pursuant to the Bonus 13 Tables attached hereto and incorporated herein.
The parties shall exchange year end paystubs, W- 14 2s, 1099s, K-1s, Schedule Cs, tax returns (if prepared), and any other documents evidencing each 15 party’s year need income by February 28th of each year for the prior year, and then to calculate 16 the additional child support each party may owe to the other party. The party who owes the 17 greater amount of additional child support shall pay the net difference between the amounts owed 18 by both parties, such that there is only one payment between the parties.
The party owing bonus 19 support shall pay the bonus support to the other party within 15 days of the exchange of earned 20 income documentation. 21 6) Notwithstanding the foregoing, when a party receives an annual cash bonus in excess of $10,000, 22 he shall pay bonus child support to the other party within one week of receipt thereof, and this 23 payment shall be credited to him in the annual calculations provided for above. When a payment 24 is made in accordance with this paragraph, the paying party shall provide at the same time as 25 payment documentation (e.g. a paystub) showing the additional income received. 26 7) The Court’s jurisdiction to calculate any base or bonus child support arrears owed for the period 27 2/10/2026 – 4/30/2026 is reserved given that Petitioner has claims regarding child support arrears 28 and child support add-ons incurred to date.
The parties shall meet and confer regarding all of 29
1 these issues. If the parties are unable to reach an agreement, either party may file a new Request 2 for Order. 3 8) Effective 4/16/2026, unreimbursed healthcare expenses for the children shall be shared 80 4 (Petitioner) / 20 (Respondent). The procedure for requesting and paying reimbursement claims 5 for unreimbursed healthcare expenses shall be as set forth in Judicial Council Form FL-182. 6 9) All other child support provisions set forth in the Judgment filed 7/25/2024 not modified above 7 shall remain in full force and effect. 8 10) The Court finds there is a significant disparity in access to funds to pay legal fees and that 9 Petitioner has the ability to pay for his own attorney’s fees and costs as well as make a significant 10 contribution to Petitioner’s attorneys fees and costs.
The Court hereby awards to Respondent 11 $55,000 in attorney’s fees and costs under Family Code section 2030 for fees and costs incurred 12 between the date the parties entered into their settlement agreement through the date of the next 13 review hearing, which the Court finds is a just, reasonable, and necessary amount. This amount 14 shall be paid to Respondent no later than 4/30/2026. 15 11) Petitioner’s request for sanctions is denied. 16 12) A review hearing is set for Tuesday, 9/15/2026 at 9:00 AM in Dept. 404 to review Respondent’s 17 seek work efforts, to consider imputing income to Respondent, and to review child support. 18 a.
At least 20 calendar days prior to the next hearing date, Respondent shall file and serve 19 an updated Income and Expense Declaration, a declaration (not to exceed 5 pages in 20 length, not including exhibits) summarizing Respondent’s work search efforts to date and 21 providing his position on whether he should be imputed with income, and a Statement of 22 Support Calculations. Respondent shall attach to his declaration his Work Search Logs. 23 b. At least 10 calendar days prior to the next hearing date, Petitioner shall file and serve an 24 updated Income and Expense Declaration (with all sections fully completed), a 25 declaration (not to exceed 5 pages in length, not including exhibits) providing his position 26 on whether Petitioner should be imputed with income, and a Statement of Support 27 Calculations. 28 13) Respondent’s attorney shall prepare the Findings and Order After Hearing, which shall include 29 the FL-342 and FL-182 forms, the XSpouse calculation, and the bonus tables.
1 14) Preparation of Order: If you are directed by the court to prepare the order after hearing – within
2 10 calendar days of the hearing you must either: (a) Serve the proposed order to the other 3 party/counsel for approval, and follow the procedures set forth in CA Rules of Court, Rule 4 5.125(c), or (b) If the other party did not appear or the matter was uncontested, submit the 5 proposed order after hearing directly to the court. Failure to submit the order after hearing within 6 10 days may allow the other party to prepare a proposed order and submit it to the court in 7 accordance with CA Rules of Court, Rule 5.125(d). 8
12
16
20
24
28
aguirre v. aguirre xspouse.xsp Xspouse 2026-1-CA
Fixed Shares John Dale Monthly figures Cash Flow #of children 0 2 2026 Guideline Proposed % time with NCP 49.99 % 0.00 % Comb. net spendable 27667 27681 Filing status HH/MLA SINGLE GUIDELINE Percent change 0% 0% # exemptions 2 2 Nets(adjusted) John Wages+salary 39583 0 John 27667 Payment cost/benefit -5425 -5413 Self-employed income 0 0 Dale 0 Net spendable income 22242 22254 Other taxable income 1200 0 Total 27667 Change from guideline 0 12 TANF+CS received 0 0 Support Other nontaxble income 0 0 Addons % of combined spendable 80% 80% 0 New spouse income 0 0 Guideln CS % of saving over guideline 0% 86% 5425 401(k) employee contrib 2042 0 Total taxes 12430 12416 S.Clara SS 0 Adjustments to income 0 0 Dep. exemption value 0 0 Total 5425 SS paid prev marriage 0 0 # withholding allowances 0 0 - CS paid prev marriage 0 0 Settings changed Net wage paycheck 21055 21055 Health insurance 686 0 Dale Other medical expense 0 0 Payment cost/benefit 5425 5427 Property tax expense 1970 0 Net spendable income 5425 5427 Ded interest expense 4807 0 Proposed Change from guideline 0 2 Charitable contributions 0 0 Tactic 9 % of combined spendable 20% 20% Misc tax deductions 0 0 CS 5427 Qual bus income ded 0 0 SS % of saving over guideline 0% 14% 0 Required union dues 0 0 Total Total taxes 0 0 5427 Mandatory retirement 0 0 Dep. exemption value 0 0 Hardship deduction 0 * 0 * Saving 14 # withholding allowances 0 0 Other GDL deductions 0 0 Releases 1 Net wage paycheck 0 0 Child care expenses 0 0 Released to John
John pays Guideline CS, Proposed CS
FC 4055 checking: ON Per Child Information Timeshare cce(John) cce(Dale) Addons Payor Basic CS Payor Pres CS Payor All children 49 - 51 0 0 0 John 5425 John 5425 John
Ava 49 - 51 0 0 0 John 2034 John 2034 John Ace 49 - 51 0 0 0 John 3390 John 3390 John
Time: 11:41:16 Superior Court of California Date: 04/15/26 County of San Francisco
4/15/26, 11:41 AM Annual Bonus Income 2026-04-15 11:41:48 Superior Court of California Xspouse 2026-1-CA County of San Francisco aguirre v. aguirre xspouse.xsp
Annual Bonus Income John Cost is an increase in support paid or a decrease in support received by this spouse Bonus income may reverse direction of CS and/or SS Annual bonus paid to Dale: 0 R = recipient of support Prior relationship(s): OFF
Additional Cost to John Child Support Spousal Support Total CS Total SS John's Bonus % of bonus $ % of bonus $ (adjusted) 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 10,000 7.42 742 0.00 0 65,839 0 20,000 7.42 1,483 0.00 0 66,581 0 30,000 7.42 2,225 0.00 0 67,322 0 40,000 7.42 2,967 0.00 0 68,064 0 50,000 7.37 3,683 0.00 0 68,781 0 60,000 7.12 4,273 0.00 0 69,371 0 70,000 6.95 4,864 0.00 0 69,961 0 80,000 6.82 5,454 0.00 0 70,552 0 90,000 6.72 6,045 0.00 0 71,142 0 100,000 6.64 6,635 0.00 0 71,733 0 110,000 6.57 7,226 0.00 0 72,323 0 120,000 6.51 7,816 0.00 0 72,913 0 130,000 6.47 8,406 0.00 0 73,504 0 140,000 6.42 8,988 0.00 0 74,085 0 150,000 6.38 9,568 0.00 0 74,665 0 160,000 6.43 10,294 0.00 0 75,392 0 170,000 6.48 11,020 0.00 0 76,118 0 180,000 6.53 11,747 0.00 0 76,844 0 190,000 6.56 12,457 0.00 0 77,554 0 200,000 6.58 13,156 0.00 0 78,253 0 210,000 6.60 13,855 0.00 0 78,952 0 220,000 6.62 14,554 0.00 0 79,651 0 230,000 6.63 15,253 0.00 0 80,351 0 240,000 6.64 15,941 0.00 0 81,038 0 250,000 6.65 16,619 0.00 0 81,716 0 260,000 6.65 17,296 0.00 0 82,394 0 270,000 6.66 17,979 0.00 0 83,076 0 280,000 6.66 18,661 0.00 0 83,758 0 290,000 6.67 19,343 0.00 0 84,441 0 300,000 6.68 20,026 0.00 0 85,123 0 310,000 6.68 20,708 0.00 0 85,805 0 320,000 6.68 21,390 0.00 0 86,488 0 330,000 6.69 22,072 0.00 0 87,170 0 340,000 6.69 22,755 0.00 0 87,852 0 350,000 6.70 23,437 0.00 0 88,534 0 360,000 6.70 24,119 0.00 0 89,217 0 370,000 6.70 24,802 0.00 0 89,899 0 380,000 6.71 25,484 0.00 0 90,581 0 390,000 6.71 26,166 0.00 0 91,264 0 400,000 6.71 26,848 0.00 0 91,946 0 410,000 6.71 27,531 0.00 0 92,628 0 420,000 6.72 28,213 0.00 0 93,310 0 430,000 6.72 28,895 0.00 0 93,993 0 440,000 6.72 29,577 0.00 0 94,675 0
file:///C:/Users/eeib/AppData/Local/Temp/23/Xtemp/AnnualBonus.html 1/2
4/15/26, 11:41 AM Annual Bonus Income 2026-04-15 11:41:48 Superior Court of California Xspouse 2026-1-CA County of San Francisco aguirre v. aguirre xspouse.xsp
Annual Bonus Income John Cost is an increase in support paid or a decrease in support received by this spouse Bonus income may reverse direction of CS and/or SS Annual bonus paid to Dale: 0 R = recipient of support Prior relationship(s): OFF
Additional Cost to John Child Support Spousal Support Total CS Total SS John's Bonus % of bonus $ % of bonus $ (adjusted) 450,000 6.72 30,260 0.00 0 95,357 0 460,000 6.73 30,942 0.00 0 96,040 0 470,000 6.73 31,624 0.00 0 96,722 0 480,000 6.73 32,307 0.00 0 97,404 0 490,000 6.73 32,989 0.00 0 98,086 0 500,000 6.73 33,671 0.00 0 98,769 0
file:///C:/Users/eeib/AppData/Local/Temp/23/Xtemp/AnnualBonus.html 2/2
4/15/26, 11:42 AM Annual Bonus Income 2026-04-15 11:42:30 Superior Court of California Xspouse 2026-1-CA County of San Francisco aguirre v. aguirre xspouse.xsp
Annual Bonus Income Dale Cost is an increase in support paid or a decrease in support received by this spouse Bonus income may reverse direction of CS and/or SS Annual bonus paid to John: 0 R = recipient of support Prior relationship(s): OFF
Additional Cost to Dale Child Support Spousal Support Total CS Total SS Dale's Bonus % of bonus $ % of bonus $ (adjusted) 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 R 0 R 10,000 42.54 4,254 0.00 0 60,841 R 0 20,000 34.39 6,877 0.00 0 58,218 R 0 30,000 28.87 8,662 0.00 0 56,433 R 0 40,000 24.88 9,951 0.00 0 55,144 R 0 50,000 22.51 11,254 0.00 0 53,841 R 0 60,000 20.86 12,516 0.00 0 52,579 R 0 70,000 20.10 14,069 0.00 0 51,026 R 0 80,000 19.31 15,447 0.00 0 49,648 R 0 90,000 18.59 16,735 0.00 0 48,360 R 0 100,000 18.01 18,007 0.00 0 47,088 R 0 110,000 17.52 19,267 0.00 0 45,828 R 0 120,000 17.10 20,516 0.00 0 44,579 R 0 130,000 16.71 21,720 0.00 0 43,375 R 0 140,000 16.36 22,907 0.00 0 42,188 R 0 150,000 16.06 24,085 0.00 0 41,010 R 0 160,000 15.78 25,254 0.00 0 39,841 R 0 170,000 15.54 26,414 0.00 0 38,681 R 0 180,000 15.31 27,566 0.00 0 37,529 R 0 190,000 15.15 28,777 0.00 0 36,318 R 0 200,000 15.02 30,034 0.00 0 35,061 R 0 210,000 14.85 31,175 0.00 0 33,920 R 0 220,000 14.70 32,337 0.00 0 32,758 R 0 230,000 14.51 33,367 0.00 0 31,728 R 0 240,000 14.33 34,392 0.00 0 30,703 R 0 250,000 14.16 35,411 0.00 0 29,684 R 0 260,000 14.01 36,416 0.00 0 28,679 R 0 270,000 13.86 37,418 0.00 0 27,677 R 0 280,000 13.72 38,416 0.00 0 26,679 R 0 290,000 13.58 39,388 0.00 0 25,707 R 0 300,000 13.47 40,419 0.00 0 24,676 R 0 310,000 13.37 41,446 0.00 0 23,649 R 0 320,000 13.27 42,469 0.00 0 22,626 R 0 330,000 13.18 43,487 0.00 0 21,608 R 0 340,000 13.09 44,503 0.00 0 20,592 R 0 350,000 13.00 45,515 0.00 0 19,580 R 0 360,000 12.92 46,523 0.00 0 18,572 R 0 370,000 12.84 47,526 0.00 0 17,569 R 0 380,000 12.77 48,525 0.00 0 16,570 R 0 390,000 12.70 49,520 0.00 0 15,575 R 0 400,000 12.63 50,500 0.00 0 14,595 R 0 410,000 12.56 51,477 0.00 0 13,618 R 0 420,000 12.49 52,450 0.00 0 12,645 R 0 430,000 12.42 53,410 0.00 0 11,685 R 0 440,000 12.34 54,304 0.00 0 10,791 R 0
file:///C:/Users/eeib/AppData/Local/Temp/23/Xtemp/AnnualBonus.html 1/2
4/15/26, 11:42 AM Annual Bonus Income 2026-04-15 11:42:30 Superior Court of California Xspouse 2026-1-CA County of San Francisco aguirre v. aguirre xspouse.xsp
Annual Bonus Income Dale Cost is an increase in support paid or a decrease in support received by this spouse Bonus income may reverse direction of CS and/or SS Annual bonus paid to John: 0 R = recipient of support Prior relationship(s): OFF
Additional Cost to Dale Child Support Spousal Support Total CS Total SS Dale's Bonus % of bonus $ % of bonus $ (adjusted) 450,000 12.27 55,195 0.00 0 9,900 R 0 460,000 12.19 56,084 0.00 0 9,011 R 0 470,000 12.12 56,963 0.00 0 8,132 R 0 480,000 12.05 57,829 0.00 0 7,266 R 0 490,000 11.98 58,692 0.00 0 6,403 R 0 500,000 11.91 59,554 0.00 0 5,541 R 0
file:///C:/Users/eeib/AppData/Local/Temp/23/Xtemp/AnnualBonus.html 2/2