MICHAEL BRECK LONG II v. CHOI SAN WONG
Case Information
Motion(s)
REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHANGE OF CHILD SUPPORT
Motion Type Tags
Other
Parties
- Petitioner: MICHAEL BRECK LONG II
- Respondent: CHOI SAN WONG
Ruling
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4
5) 6 MICHAEL BRECK LONG II,) Case Number: FDI-18-789439) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: April 16, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 CHOI SAN WONG,) Department: 404) 10 Respondent) Presiding: AI MORI) 11) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHANGE OF CHILD SUPPORT 13 TENTATIVE RULING 14 Having read and considered the pleadings, declarations, and other evidence submitted in this matter, the 15 Court makes the following findings and orders: 16 A. Procedural History 17 1) Petitioner Michael Breck Long II (Father) and Respondent Choi San Wong (Mother) have one 18 minor child, Corban (DOB: 11/11/2010, age 15).
The parties married on 4/24/2010 and their date 19 of separation is 7/1/2015, for a marriage of 5 years and 2 months. Both parties are self- 20 represented. 21 2) On 4/5/2019, a Dissolution Judgment was entered in this matter. The Judgment provides in 22 relevant part that Mother will pay 100% of the cost of all extracurricular activities, childcare, 23 lessons, school supplies, camps, and sports. 24 3) On 12/10/2020, a Stipulation to Establish or Modify Child Support and Order was entered which 25 provides in relevant part that Father will pay Mother $1,747 per month in guideline child support; 26 the parties will share equally uninsured healthcare expenses for the child; and “all other child 27 support provisions in the Judgment entered April 3, 2019 remain in full force and effect.” 28 4) Now on for hearing is Father’s Request for Order filed 1/28/2026 asking the Court to modify the 29 current child support order because Father was laid off on 12/5/2025 and because Father is now
1 the “primary financial supporter of two additional dependent children born after the existing order 2 who reside with me full time.” 3 5) On 1/28/2026, Father filed an Income and Expense Declaration. 4 6) There is no Proof of Service on file for Father’s Request for Order and Mother did not file a 5 Responsive Declaration. 6 B. Findings and Order 7 1) Because there is no Proof of Service on file for Father’s Request for Order filed 1/28/2026, the 8 hearing on Father’s Request for Order is hereby continued to Thursday, 6/18/2026 at 9:00 AM 9 in Dept. 404. 10 2) No later than 5/15/2026, Father shall file an updated Income and Expense Declaration. 11 3) By the deadlines set forth in the Code of Civil Procedure, Father shall have a third-party age 18 or 12 older following documents served on Mother and file a Proof of Service evidencing compliance 13 with this order in advance of the next hearing date: 14 a.
Request for Order filed 1/28/2026 15 b. Income and Expense Declaration filed 1/28/2026 16 c. Father’s updated Income and Expense Declaration 17 d. Blank Responsive Declaration (FL-320) 18 e. Blank Income and Expense Declaration (FL-150) 19 f.
Tentative Ruling
Instructions 20 4) Father is encouraged to seek assistance from the ACCESS Center. Information for contacting the 21 ACCESS Center can be found here: https://sf.courts.ca.gov/access-legal-self-help-center. 22 5) The Court will prepare the Findings and Order After Hearing. 23
27
29