| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Notice Of Motion And Motion To Appoint Appraiser To Determine Fair Market Value Under Partition Of Real Property Act
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25622934 - May 15, 2026 Hearing date: May 15, 2026 Case number: CGC25622934 Case title: DANIEL HAIM HOFFMAN ET AL VS. DAVID KOSLOWSKI ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25622934 | Case Title: | | DANIEL HAIM HOFFMAN ET AL VS. DAVID KOSLOWSKI ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-05-15 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Appoint Appraiser To Determine Fair Market Value Under Partition Of Real Property Act; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities; Declaration Of Maya Rhode | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for May 15, 2026. Line 3.
PLAINTIFF Motion To Appoint Appraiser To Determine Fair Market Value Under Partition Of Real Property Act; is CONTINUED to June 24, 2026 for a hearing to determine the FMV of the property pursuant to CCP section 874.316(f).
Parties to prepare a form of notice in compliance with CCP 874.316(e) and deliver it to the Court no later than 9:00 a.m. on May 15, 2026. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.
A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”