| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT
SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 302 - CGC26634438 - May 15, 2026 Hearing date: May 15, 2026 Case number: CGC26634438 Case title: MILLER KELLEY ARCHITECTS, INC. VS. ROBERTO ALONSO BETANCORT ET AL Case Number: | | CGC26634438 | Case Title: | | MILLER KELLEY ARCHITECTS, INC. VS. ROBERTO ALONSO BETANCORT ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-05-15 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | On the Law & Motion / Discovery calendar for May 15, 2026, line 11.
DEFENDANT ROBERTO BETANCORT'S MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT. Off calendar. Defendant seeks to strike the complaint pursuant to CCP 435. Defendant fails to provide a declaration in compliance with CCP 435.5(a) showing a "meet and confer in person, by telephone, or by video conference." The court orders the parties to comply with the code and meet and confer.
The court notes that plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file a cross-complaint set for June 5, 2026, in a related case (CGC-25-629608). The court rarely denies motions to file compulsory cross-complaints. CCP 426.50 has been interpreted as requiring the court to grant leave to file a compulsory cross-complaint absent bad faith. (Silver Organizations Ltd. v. Frank (1990) 217 Cal.App.3d 94, 98-99 ["Factors such as oversight, inadvertence, neglect, mistake or other cause, are insufficient grounds to deny the motion unless accompanied by bad faith."].)
The law strongly favors granting leave as compulsory claims are barred if not pleaded in the underlying case. The principle of liberality in CCP 426.50 "requires that a strong showing of bad faith be made in order to support a denial of the right to file a cross-complaint...[i]t is preferable that the parties have their day in court." (Sidney v. Sup. Ct. (1988) 198 Cal.App.3d 710, 718.) Delay in filing a cross-complaint is not sufficient to establish bad faith, unless the filing of the cross-complaint would "work a substantial injustice to the opposing party and would prejudice the opposing party's position in some way." (Foot's Transfer & Storage Co. v.
Superior Court. (1980) 114 Cal.App.3d 897, 903.) The trial date in the related case is presently April 5, 2027. Even if there were delay, the court cannot imagine any salient prejudice given the current trial date. Reasonable counsel should be able to resolve this matter without court intervention, e.g., voluntary dismissal of this action and stipulate to the filing of the compulsory cross-complaint in the related case. Defendant's response to the complaint in this action is now due by June 15, 2026.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing. Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/JMQ) |