UNIFUND CCR, LLC vs. CAROLINA SILVA-MIRANDA
Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Judgment
Motion type
Monetary amounts referenced
Parties
Attorneys
Ruling
August 14, 2026 Law and Motion Calendar PAGE 25 HONORABLE MICHAEL L. MAU, Department 20 ________________________________________________________________________ 10:00 AM Line 1 23-CLJ-05977 UNIFUND CCR, LLC vs. CAROLINA SILVA-MIRANDA
UNIFUND CCR, LLC SPENCER PENUELA CAROLINA SILVA-MIRANDA ADAM FULLMAN
Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Judgment
TENTATIVE RULING:
Plaintiff Unifund CCR, LLC’s Motion for Entry of Judgment is not opposed and is GRANTED. The Declaration of Plaintiff’s Counsel Spencer Penuela filed 7/13/2026 attaches a copy of the relevant Settlement Agreement and Stipulation for Entry of Judgment upon Default (the “Stipulation”), establishing the settlement terms, defendant Carolina Silva-Miranda’s uncured default and its counsel’s non-response, allowing entry of Judgment. Penuela Decl. ¶¶ 4-6 and Exh.
1. The Stipulation expressly allows for enforcement of its terms under Code of Civil Procedure Section 664.6. Penuela Delc., Exh. 1 – Stipulation ¶ 3.
The Court orders Judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant for $11,698.92 in principle, plus $384.07 in court costs, for a total Judgment of $12,082.99.
If uncontested, the Court will sign and serve the proposed Order and proposed Judgment submitted with the motion, and waives any other order after hearing.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must email Dept20@sanmateocourt.org with a copy to all other parties by 4:00 p.m. stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”