| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Motion To Compel Defendant Volkswagen Group Of America, Inc.S Response, Without Objection, To Plaintiffs First Set Of Requests For Production Of Documents
SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 302 - CGC25629262 - May 13, 2026 Hearing date: May 13, 2026 Case number: CGC25629262 Case title: CLAIRE HEITLINGER VS. VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC. ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25629262 | Case Title: | | CLAIRE HEITLINGER VS. VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC. ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-05-13 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion To Compel Defendant Volkswagen Group Of America, Inc.S Response, Without Objection, To Plaintiffs First Set Of Requests For Production Of Documents | Rulings: | | Set for Law and Motion/Discovery on Wednesday, May 13, 2026, Line 9, 1-PLAINTIFF CLAIRE HEITLINGER'S Motion To Compel Defendant Volkswagen Group Of America, Inc.'s Response, Without Objection, To Plaintiffs First Set Of Requests For Production Of Documents.
Plaintiff Claire Heitlinger's Motion To Compel Defendant Volkswagen Group Of America, Inc.'s Response, Without Objection, To Plaintiffs First Set Of Requests For Production Of Documents is DENIED. The court finds Plaintiff agreed or should have agreed to extend the time for Defendant's responses to 4/14/2026. Defendant provided responses by 4/14/2026, which was before Plaintiff filed this motion and, more important, within the time allowed (or that should have been allowed) by agreement (or that would have been allowed by court order). Thus, the motion is denied.
Plaintiff is reminded of her duty to meet and confer. All parties must make reasonable and good faith efforts to resolve discovery disputes informally amongst themselves before presenting them to the court for resolution. (See Code of Civil Procedure section 2016.040.) The Civil Discovery Act is intended to be self-executing; court involvement is the exception, not the rule. (See Obregon v. Superior Court (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 424, 434, quoting Townsend v. Superior Court (1998) 61 Cal.App.4th 1431, 1434 ["[I]t is a 'central precept' of the Civil Discovery Act ... that discovery 'be essentially self-executing[.]' "].) Self-execution of the Discovery Act is possible only if the parties work together and engage in reasonable and good faith efforts to informally resolve the discovery disputes before their presentation to the court.
Here, reasonable counsel would have expressly and without hesitation agreed to extend the time for responses to 4/14/2026. Plaintiff's counsel contention this didn't happen is belied by the record. In any event, the failure to so stipulate was unreasonable.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/JMQ) | |