DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24STCV15146·la·Civil·Civil
Hearing 11 days agoGRANTED

TYRONE PARKS v. SECURITY ENFORCEMENT GROUP, INC., et al.

PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

Hearing date
Aug 14, 2026
Department
508
Prevailing
Plaintiff
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$141,389.75$135,000$3,149.75$3,240.00

Parties

PlaintiffTYRONE PARKS
DefendantSECURITY ENFORCEMENT GROUP, INC.
DefendantJULIO ALEX CARRILLO

Ruling

(Stanley Mosk Courthouse: Dept. 508) August 14, 2026 DEPARTMENT 508 LAW AND MOTION RULINGS

Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles Department 508 TYRONE PARKS, Plaintiff, vs. SECURITY ENFORCEMENT GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants. | Case No.: |

| Hearing Date: | August 14, 2026 | Hearing Time: | 8:30 a.m. | ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT | Plaintiff Tyrone Parks ("Plaintiff") requests entry of default judgment against Defendants Security Enforcement Group, Inc. and Julio Alex Carrillo, jointly and severally, in the amount of $141,389.75, comprising $135,000 demanded in the complaint, $3,149.75 in prejudgment interest, and $3,240.00 in attorney fees. The Court finds that Plaintiff sufficiently supported his request with the submitted evidence and declarations. Accordingly, the Court grants Plaintiff's request and will sign the judgment. No appearance is necessary at the hearing on this matter. DATED: August 14, 2026 ______________________________

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share