DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV03332·santabarbara·Civil·Civil Law & Motion
Hearing 12 days agoCONTINUED

Elizabeth Peterson vs Sunrun Inc

Motion for Approval

Hearing date
Aug 12, 2026
Department
N/A
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Nov 25, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffElizabeth Peterson
DefendantSunrun Inc

Attorneys

Reuben Nathanfor Plaintiff
Daniel McQueenfor Defendant
Brett Youngfor Defendant

Ruling

Case Number

Case Type Civil Law & Motion Hearing Date / Time Wed, 08/12/2026 - 10:00 Nature of Proceedings Motion for Approval Tentative Ruling Reuben Nathan for Plaintiff Daniel McQueen, Brett Young for Defendant

This is a motion to approve a PAGA settlement in which there is a similar matter pending in Los Angeles County and in other counties. A Los Angeles Plaintiff has petitioned for coordination of these actions. When this matter was last before the Court, on July 1, 2026, the Court continued the hearing to this date to await a determination of the coordination petition. On August 5, 2026, the parties submitted a joint status report stating that the coordination petition remains pending with the Judicial Council. The matter is continued to Wednesday, 11/25/26, at 10:00 a.m.; the parties are invited to file a status report at least five Court days before the continued hearing. No appearance is necessary on 8/12/26.

Tentative Ruling: Erika E. Szell v. Housing Authority of the City of Santa Barbara, et al. Tentative Ruling: Erika E. Szell v. Housing Authority of the City of Santa Barbara, et al.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share