DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV07082·santabarbara·Civil·Civil Law & Motion
Hearing 12 days agoCONTINUED

Raymond Lance Stoll vs Jaguar Land Rover North America LLC

Status report as to Motion to Compel

Hearing date
Aug 12, 2026
Department
N/A
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffRaymond Lance Stoll
DefendantJaguar Land Rover North America LLC

Attorneys

David Derderianfor Plaintiff
Michelle Yangfor Plaintiff
Andres Roldanfor Plaintiff
Matthew Wolffor Defendant
Robert Chofor Defendant
Daniel Forgyfor Defendant

Ruling

Case Number

Case Type Civil Law & Motion Hearing Date / Time Wed, 08/12/2026 - 10:00 Nature of Proceedings Status report as to Motion to Compel Tentative Ruling David Derderian, Michelle Yang, Andres Roldan, for Plaintiff Matthew Wolf, Lauren K. VanDenburg, Robert Cho, Daniel Forgy, for Defendant

The case [Lemon law] was filed 12/16/24 and the answer was filed 1/16/25.

The trial date was originally set for 4/16/26, but continued at an ex parte motion hearing brought by the Plaintiff on 4/3/26 to 8/19/26. This is a further hearing on a motion to compel that was heard on July 29, 2026, for a report on the status of PMQ depositions. [There is no status report filed when this was drafted.] This confirms: The Pretrial conference for the trial is on 8/19/26 at 11:30 am; all trial documents due one week in advance - i/e. 8/12/26 The jury panel comes over on 8/20/26 at 9 am. The case will not be continued. Please do not make that request. The dates have been reserved and the Jury Commissioner notified.

Tentative Ruling: People of the State of California v. Eighty-Seven Thousand Six Hundred and Fourteen Dollars ($87,614) U.S. Currency Tentative Ruling: People of the State of California v. Eighty-Seven Thousand Six Hundred and Fourteen Dollars ($87,614) U.S. Currency

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share