DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26681160·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 11 days agoCONTINUED

MARK GIRAUDO VS. THE AXION GROUP, DBA THE ROYAL OAK BAR ET AL

MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS OF CASE(S) CUD-26-681158 WITH CASE CUD-26-681160

Hearing date
Aug 13, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 20, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMARK GIRAUDO
DefendantTHE AXION GROUP, DBA THE ROYAL OAK BAR
DefendantKATHERINE PAPAGEORGE

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26681160 - August 13, 2026 Hearing date: August 13, 2026 Case number: CUD26681160 Case title: MARK GIRAUDO VS. THE AXION GROUP, DBA THE ROYAL OAK BAR ET AL Case Number: | | CUD26681160 | Case Title: | | MARK GIRAUDO VS. THE AXION GROUP, DBA THE ROYAL OAK BAR ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-08-13 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS OF CASE(S) CUD-26-681158 WITH CASE CUD-26-681160 | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for August 13, 2026. Line 13.1.

DEFENDANT KATHERINE PAPAGEORGE MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS OF CASE(S) CUD-26-681158 WITH CASE CUD-26-681160 is continued to August 20, 2026 for the moving and opposing parties to comply with LRSF 2.7B and provide courtesy copies of the moving, opposition, and reply papers no later than August 14, 2026 with a cover letter reflecting the new hearing date.=(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share