DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV028751·sacramento·Civil·Civil
Hearing about 1 month agoThe Initial Case Management Conference scheduled for 07/22/2026 is vacated.

VALLELEY vs JOHNSON

Initial Case Management Conference

Hearing date
Jul 22, 2026
Department
16D
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffVALLELEY
DefendantJOHNSON

Ruling

25CV028751: VALLELEY vs JOHNSON 07/22/2026 Initial Case Management Conference in Department 16D

Tentative Ruling

Notices:

Parties who wish to contest the tentative ruling below must: (1) request a hearing by calling the Department 16D Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874-3056 no later than 4:00 p.m. on the Court day before the scheduled CMC, and (2) advise opposing counsel of the request. If a hearing is not requested by 4:00 p.m. on the Court day before the scheduled CMC, the tentative ruling shall become the final order of the Court.

If a hearing is requested, the Court assumes that all parties will appear remotely via Zoom unless the Court orders in-person attendance. The Department 16D Zoom Link is https://saccourt-cagov.zoomgov.com/j/16146506749 and the Zoom Meeting ID is 161 4650 6749. To appear telephonically via Zoom, call (833) 568-8864 and enter the Department 16D Zoom ID referenced above.

No appearance is required under the following conditions:

On the Court's own motion, the Initial Case Management Conference scheduled for 07/22/2026 is vacated.

Given that the Presiding Judge has specially set trial for August 25, 2026, no further Case Management Conferences will be set.

The Mandatory Settlement Conference on August 13, 2026 shall remain as set.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share