DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25WM000228·sacramento·Civil·Pitchess Motion
Hearing about 2 months agoCONTINUED

JAIME HERNANDEZ v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al.

Motion for Discovery of Peace Officer Personnel Records (Pitchess Motion)

Hearing date
Jul 9, 2026
Department
3A
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 13, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerJAIME HERNANDEZ
RespondentCALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION

Ruling

25WM000228: HERNANDEZ vs CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al. 07/09/2026 Hearing on Motion for Discovery of Peace Officer Personnel Records (Pitchess Motion) in Department 3A

Tentative Ruling

DATE/TIME: July 9, 2026 2:30 p.m. DEP. NO.: 3A JUDGE: HON. JENNIFER K. CLERK: S. PAUL ROCKWELL

JAIME HERNANDEZ, Case No.: 25WM000228 Petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., Respondents,

Nature of Proceedings: Pitchess Motion

The following shall constitute the Court’s tentative ruling on the above matter, set for hearing in Department 3A, on Thursday, July 9, 2026, at 2:30 p.m. The tentative ruling shall become the ruling of the Court, unless a party desiring to be heard so advises the Clerk of Department 3A no later than 4:00 p.m. on the Court day preceding the hearing, and further advises the Clerk that such party has notified the other side of its intention to appear.

The Court strongly encourages parties to appear remotely for the hearing on the tentative ruling through the Court’s Zoom Application. However, any party wishing to appear in person may do so, provided that party notifies the Court by 4:00 the Court day before the hearing.

The parties may join the Zoom session for the hearing by audio and/or video through the following link: DEPT JUDGE ZOOM LINK MEETING ID 3A Hon. Jennifer K. https://saccourt-ca- 161 5277 4854

25WM000228: HERNANDEZ vs CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al. 07/09/2026 Hearing on Motion for Discovery of Peace Officer Personnel Records (Pitchess Motion) in Department 3A

Rockwell gov.zoomgov.com/j/16152774854

Parties requesting services of a Court Reporter will need to arrange for private Court Reporter services at their own expense, pursuant to Government Code § 68086 and California Rules of Court, Rule 2.956. Requirements for requesting a Court Reporter are listed in the Policy for Official Reporter Pro Tempore available on the Sacramento Superior Court website at https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/court-reporters/docs/crtrp-6a.pdf. Parties may contact Court- Approved Official Reporters Pro Tempore by using the list of Court Approved Official Reporters Pro Tempore, available at https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/court-reporters/docs/crtrp- 13.Pdf

If a Court Reporter from the Court’s Approved Official Reporter Pro Tempore list is not used, aStipulation and Appointment of Official Reporter Pro Tempore (CV/E-206) must be signed by each party, the private court reporter, and the Judge prior to the hearing. Once the form is signed, it must be filed with the Clerk of Department 3A.

Pursuant to Government Code Section 69959, Court Reporters are not permitted through the use of remote technology, and any Court Reporter designated for the hearing shall be physically present in the Courtroom.

If a litigant has been granted a fee waiver and requests a Court Reporter, the party must submit a Request for Court Reporter by a Party with a Fee Waiver (CV/E-211) and it must be filed with the Clerk of Department 3A at least 10 days prior to the hearing or at the time the proceeding is scheduled if less than 10 days away. Once approved, the Clerk of Department 3A will forward the form to the Court Reporter’s Office and an official Court Reporter will be provided.

TENTATIVE RULING

Petitioner Jamie Hernandez’s motion for discovery of peace officer personnel records (Pitchess Motion) is continued on the Court’s own motion to Thursday, August 13, 2026, at 2:30 p.m.

Ten days prior to the hearing, the parties, either jointly or separately, shall file a status report apprising the Court of the status of the related administrative appeal currently pending before the State Personnel Board, and any other relevant updates.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share