DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
HG18920381·alameda·Civil·Civil
Hearing 11 days agoCONTINUED

Christiansen VS Kislingbury

Motion to Lift Bankruptcy Stay

Hearing date
Aug 13, 2026
Department
512
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Sep 24, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMarc Christiansen
DefendantLinda Kislingbury
DefendantRichard Kislingbury

Ruling

HG18920381: Christiansen VS Kislingbury 08/13/2026 Hearing on Motion - Other RE: STAY; filed by Linda Kislingbury (Defendant) + CRS# A-18920381-001 in Department 512

Tentative Ruling - 08/12/2026 Elizabeth Riles

The Hearing on Motion - Other RE: STAY; filed by Linda Kislingbury (Defendant) + CRS# A- 18920381-001 scheduled for 08/13/2026 is continued to 09/24/2026 at 02:30 PM in Department 512 at Hayward Hall of Justice.

Defendants Richard Kislingbury et al.’s (“Defendants”) Motion to Lift Bankruptcy Stay is CONTINUED to Thursday, 9/24/2026 at 2:30 p.m. in Dept. 512.

The moving papers on this Motion do no appear to have been properly served on plaintiff in pro per Marc Christiansen (“Plaintiff”). Pursuant to CCP § 1010.6(b) and (c), in pro per parties may not be served by email unless they have consented on the record to accept such service. The Court is unable to find any record that Plaintiff in pro per has agreed to accept service of papers in this action by email.

Therefore, Defendants must re-serve Plaintiff with the moving papers by a permissible method along with a revised Notice of Motion noticing the continued 9/24/2026 hearing date. The Court observes that Plaintiff has an attorney representing him in a limited capacity, but the present motion does not appear to be within the scope of the representation as listed in the relevant Notice of Limited Scope Representation filed on 2/23/2024.

CONTESTING TENTATIVE RULINGS

PLEASE NOTE: If any party contests the tentative ruling, the hearing on the motion will occur remotely via the court's own video-conferencing system.

Pursuant to California Rule of Court 3.1308, subdivision (a)(1), this tentative ruling will become the order of the Court unless it is contested before 4:00 PM on the court day preceding the noticed hearing date.

To contest a tentative ruling, a party should do the following:

First, the party must notify Department 512, by email at Dept512@alameda.courts.ca.gov and copy all counsel of record and self-represented parties. The contesting party must state in the subject line of the email the case name, case number and motion.

Second, the party shall log into the eCourt Public Portal, search for this case (e.g., by case number), select the case name, select the "Tentative Rulings" tab, click the "Click to Contest this Ruling" button, enter the party's name and a brief statement of the party's reason for contesting the tentative, and click "Proceed." HG18920381: Christiansen VS Kislingbury 08/13/2026 Hearing on Motion - Other RE: STAY; filed by Linda Kislingbury (Defendant) + CRS# A-18920381-001 in Department 512 Parties may appear via videoconference, using the Zoom.com website or application.

TO CONNECT TO ZOOM:

Join the meeting using the following link: https://www.zoomgov.com/j/16057661931 Join the meeting by Phone:

Meeting ID: 160 5766 1931

1 669 254 5252, 16057661931# US (San Jose) 1 669 216 1590, 16057661931# US (San Jose) 833 568 8864 US Toll-free

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share