DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV089313·alameda·Civil·Personal Injury
Hearing 11 days agoCONTINUED

ARSENITH, et al. vs 3M COMPANY F/K/A MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, et al.

Motion to Quash Service of Summons (styled as a Motion to Dismiss)

Hearing date
Aug 13, 2026
Department
18
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Sep 1, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Quash rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffARSENITH
Defendant3M COMPANY F/K/A MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY

Ruling

24CV089313: ARSENITH, et al. vs 3M COMPANY F/K/A MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, et al. 08/13/2026 Hearing on Motion to Quash Service of Summons (styled as a Motion to Dismiss) CRS# 020638632021 in Department 18

Tentative Ruling - 08/12/2026 Patrick McKinney

The Hearing on Motion to Quash Service of Summons (styled as a Motion to Dismiss) CRS# 020638632021 scheduled for 08/13/2026 is continued to 09/01/2026 at 01:30 PM in Department 18 at Rene C. Davidson Courthouse.

The motion is continued to allow for the resolution of Plaintiffs' motion to compel further jurisdictional discovery.

CONTESTING TENTATIVE ORDERS

Notify the Court and all other parties no later than 4:00 pm the day before the scheduled hearing and identify the issues you wish to argue through the following steps.

1. Log into eCourt Public Portal - https://eportal.alameda.courts.ca.gov 2. Case Search 3. Enter the Case Number and select Search 4. Select the Case Name 5. Select the Tentative Rulings Tab 6. Select Click to Contest this Ruling 7. Enter your Name and Reason for Contesting 8. Select Proceed.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share