Valdivia vs. Diversified Maintenance Systems, LLC
Demurrer to Amended Complaint
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
107 Sanderson J. Ray Apartments Property, LLC vs. SLR California Constructions, LLC, 2024-01418621 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice – GRANTED
Moving attorney Christopher C. Broughton’s application to appear pro hac vice for Plaintiff Sanderson J. Ray Apartments Property, LLC is GRANTED. The application and supporting documents demonstrate that all requirements of California Rules of Court, Rule 9.40 are satisfied.
Plaintiff to give notice. 108 Security National Insurance Company vs. O. C. Services Inc., 2020-01164470 Motions to be Relieved as Counsel – GRANTED
Aaron C. Watts (“Moving Attorney”) moves to be relieved as counsel of record for (1) Defendant O.C. Services Inc. and (2) Defendant S & C Inc.
The motions are unopposed. Moving Attorney has stated a basis for permissive withdrawal under Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.16. The motion satisfies the notice, declaration, and proposed order requirements of Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362.
The motions are GRANTED. The orders relieving counsel will be effective upon counsel filing proof of service of a copy of the signed orders on the client and on all parties that have appeared in the case. (Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362(e).)
The Court will interlineate Par. 7 of the Order with the next scheduled hearing date in this action: September 14, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. in Dept N14, Motion for Entry of Judgment and OSC re: Dismissal
Moving Attorney to give notice.
109 Valdivia vs. Diversified Maintenance Systems, LLC, 2025-01528658 Demurrer to Amended Complaint – OVERRULED IN PART AND SUSTAINED IN PART
Defendant B. BRAUN MEDICAL INC. demurs to all causes of action in Plaintiff’s first amended complaint.
The demurrer is overruled as to the 1st through 4th causes of action. There are sufficient facts pled to put
Defendant on notice of the claims against it, including allegations of being a “joint employer”.
The demurrer to the 5th cause of action is sustained as outside the scope of the previous order sustaining the original complaint with leave to amend. Leave to add a new cause of action must be by separate motion.
Plaintiff shall answer the first amended complaint within 20 days. Plaintiff to give notice.
110 111 112 113 114
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”