DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
2024-01411587·orange·Civil·Civil
Hearing 7 days agoGRANTED

Beasley vs. Soheil

Motions to be Relieved as Counsel

Hearing date
Aug 17, 2026
Department
N14
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffRodney Nelson
PlaintiffPamela Freeman

Attorneys

Samuel Ogbogufor Plaintiff

Ruling

Defendant’s request for attorney’s fees is not properly made by way of this demurrer. The request is DENIED, without prejudice.

The Court GRANTS Defendant’s requests for judicial notice.

Defendant is ORDERED to prepare and submit proposed judgment of dismissal.

Defendant to give notice.

103 Beasley vs. Soheil, Motions to be Relieved as Counsel – GRANTED

Samuel Ogbogu (“Moving Attorney”) moves to be relieved as counsel of record for plaintiffs Rodney Nelson and Pamela Freeman.

The motions are unopposed and Moving Attorney has stated a basis for permissive withdrawal under the Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.16. All other requirements have been satisfied.

Thus, the motions are GRANTED.

The order relieving counsel will be effective upon counsel filing proof of service of a copy of the signed order on the client and on all parties that have appeared in the case. (Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362(e).)

Moving Attorney to give notice. 104 Chrisman vs. Norm Motion for Leave to File a Cross-complaint – GRANTED Reeves Inc, 2025- 01532240 Defendant Wuerer Family Partnership (“Defendant”) moves for an order granting it leave to file a cross- complaint against Norm Reeves, Inc. and Coastal Auto Sales, Inc., dba Norm Reeves Honda Superstore Huntington Beach. No opposition has been filed.

Defendant’s proposed cross-complaint includes causes of action for express and implied indemnity, declaratory relief and apportionment of fault. Defendant owns the subject property underlying plaintiff’s action and leases the property to the proposed cross-defendants. The

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share