DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
PR0001894·marin·Probate·Probate
Hearing 11 days agoCONTINUED

IN THE MATTER OF GISELA SCHARIAT

Petition for Letters of Administration

Hearing date
Aug 13, 2026
Department
C
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Sep 17, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerMarkus Schariat

Ruling

PR0001894 IN THE MATTER OF GISELA SCHARIAT

Petition for Letters of Administration, filed by Markus Schariat on 7/13/26.

Ruling. This matter is continued to September 17, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. Petitioner is ordered to address the following: 1. File a Supplement to Petition, signed and verified by Petitioner, stating whether Decedent was survived by any issue of a predeceased child. (Item 5a(7)-(8).) If so, please provide their names, ages, relationships to Decedent, and address.

2. Mail notice of the Petition for Probate to all interested parties, including any parties identified in Issue 1, using the mandatory Judicial Council Form “Notice of Petition to Administer Estate.” (Judicial Council Forms, form DE-121.)

3. File a copy of the DE-121 that was mailed, with the Proof of Service completed on page 2 showing that all interested parties received at least fifteen days’ notice of the Petition for Probate. (Prob. Code, § 8110.)

4. File Proof of Publication of Notice. (Prob. Code, § 8120 et seq.)

5. Submit proposed Order on the mandatory form “Order for Probate.” (Judicial Council Forms, form DE-140.)

6. All documents must be filed or submitted at least five court days prior to hearing. (Super. Ct. Marin County, Local Rules, rule 6.2(b), Filing, Hearing, and Continuance Procedures.)

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share