DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV447681·santaclara·Civil·Consumer Warranty
Hearing 19 days agoVACATED AS MOOT

Hansraj Bhamu v. Ford Motor Company, et al.

Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Plaintiff’s Fifth Cause of Action for Fraudulent Inducement-Concealment

Hearing date
Aug 5, 2026
Department
16
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffHansraj Bhamu
DefendantFord Motor Company

Ruling

LINE CASE NO. CASE TITLE TENTATIVE RULING 9:01 1 9:01 2 9:01 3

9:01 4 9:01 5

9:00 24CV447681 Hansraj Bhamu Order VACATING AS MOOT 1 v. Defendant Ford Motor Company’s Ford Motor Company, et al. Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Plaintiff’s Fifth Cause of Action for Fraudulent Inducement-Concealment

Defendant Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) moves under Code of Civil Procedure Section 438 for Judgment on the Pleadings as to the Fifth Cause of Action for Fraudulent Inducement-Concealment of the Complaint of Plaintiff Hansraj Bhamu (“Plaintiff’). Notice of Motion (the “Motion”) at 1:4-6 (filed: February 6, 2026).

But the Motion is now Moot because on July 27, 2026, Plaintiff filed a Request for Dismissal of the Fifth Cause of Action for Fraudulent Inducement-Concealment. And the Fifth Cause of Action was dismissed on that same date by the Clerk of the Court.

Accordingly, the Motion is VACATED as MOOT.

SO ORDERED.

Line 1 Case Name: Hansraj Bhamu v. Ford Motor Company, et al. Case No.: 24CV447681

See Order above (Vacating Motion as Moot in light of July 27, 2026 Dismissal of Fifth Cause of Action for Fraudulent Inducement—Concealment).

7

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share