ANDRE TEIXEIRA VS. CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL
Motion to Have Requests for Admission Deemed Admitted; Motion for Costs, Sanctions, and Attorneys Fees
Motion type
Monetary amounts referenced
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 301 - CGC26632973 - August 13, 2026 Hearing date: August 13, 2026 Case number: CGC26632973 Case title: ANDRE TEIXEIRA VS. CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL Case Number: | | CGC26632973 | Case Title: | | ANDRE TEIXEIRA VS. CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-08-13 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Have Requests For Admission, Set One, Deemed Admitted, Set One Against Defendant Loy Tsang, Under C.C.P. Section 2033.280 Et.
Seq. And Request For Costs, Sanctions, And Attorneys Fees Under C.C.P. 2023.010 Et Seq. And 2033.280 Et Seq. Against Defendant Loy Tsang And/Or His Counsel Of Record, San Francisco City Attorney Office, In The Amount Of $6,460.00 | Rulings: | | Matter on the LAW AND MOTION / DISCOVERY Calendar for Thursday, Aug-13-2026. LINE 7. 1-PLAINTIFF ANDRE TEIXEIRA's, AN INDIVIDUAL, Motion To Have Requests For Admission, Set One, Deemed Admitted, Set One Against Defendant Loy Tsang, Under C.C.P. Section 2033.280 Et.
Seq. And Request For Costs, Sanctions, And Attorneys Fees Under C.C.P. 2023.010 Et Seq. And 2033.280 Et Seq. Against Defendant Loy Tsang And/Or His Counsel Of Record, San Francisco City Attorney Office, In The Amount Of $6,460.00. | |
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”