DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26681981·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 12 days agoGRANTED

VALSTOCK VENTURES, LLC VS. TIMOTHY MARTIN ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Terminating Sanctions, Issue Sanctions, Evidence Sanctions, And Monetary Sanctions Against Defendant Timothy Martin

Hearing date
Aug 12, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Sanctions rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffVALSTOCK VENTURES, LLC
DefendantTIMOTHY MARTIN

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for August 12, 2026. Line 13. PLAINTIFF VALSTOCK VENTURES, LLC Notice Of Motion And Motion For Terminating Sanctions, Issue Sanctions, Evidence Sanctions, And Monetary Sanctions Against Defendant Timothy Martin is GRANTED, subject to opposition. Defendant's May 7, 2026 Answer is stricken. Plaintiff may seek a default/default judgment. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share