DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD20667352·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 12 days agoCONTINUED

FELL HOLDINGS LLC VS. FELL ST AUTOMOTIVE CLINIC ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Further Responses To Defendant Laurence F Nasey's Requests For Production Set Two Nos 4-7; And Request For Sanctions

Hearing date
Aug 12, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 26, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffFELL HOLDINGS LLC
DefendantFELL ST AUTOMOTIVE CLINIC
DefendantLAURENCE NASEY

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for August 12, 2026. Line 4. DEFENDANT LAURENCE NASEY Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Further Responses To Defendant Laurence F Naseys Requests For Production Set Two Nos 4-7; And Request For Sanctions is continued to August 26, 2026 on the Court's own motion. This matter will be heard in department 505 by the Honorable Michelle Tong at 1:30 p.m. per the order of the presiding judge.=(501/MT) Parties may appear in-person, or via Zoom Video Conference (Meeting ID: 160 4132 4666 Passcode: 872834).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share