DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC26635938·sf·Civil·Arbitration
Hearing 12 days agoHearing required. The parties are requested to be prepared to argue whether or not the last sentence of section 11 of the Participant Agreement is substantively unconscionable.

JAMIELLEN BAILEY VS. VEDIC MEDITATION RETREATS LLC ET AL

Motion To Compel Arbitration And Stay Action

Hearing date
Aug 12, 2026
Department
302
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJAMIELLEN BAILEY
DefendantVEDIC MEDITATION RETREATS LLC
DefendantTHOMAS KNOLES

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 302 - CGC26635938 - August 12, 2026 Hearing date: August 12, 2026 Case number: CGC26635938 Case title: JAMIELLEN BAILEY VS. VEDIC MEDITATION RETREATS LLC ET AL Case Number: | | CGC26635938 | Case Title: | | JAMIELLEN BAILEY VS. VEDIC MEDITATION RETREATS LLC ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-08-12 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Arbitration And Stay Action | Rulings: | | Matter on calendar for Wednesday, August 12, 2026, Line 15, DEFENDANT VEDIC MEDITATION RETREATS LLC, THOMAS KNOLES' Motion To Compel Arbitration And Stay Action.

Hearing required. The parties are requested to be prepared to argue whether or not the last sentence of section 11 of the Participant Agreement is substantively unconscionable and, if so, whether, per the guidance in Ramirez v. Charter Communications, Inc, (2024) 16 Cal. 5th 478, 513-519, the court should refuse to enforce the arbitration agreement, sever the last sentence, or limit the last sentence to avoid any unconscionable result.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/HEK). | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share