DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV491068·santaclara·Civil·Civil
Hearing 12 days agoDemurrer to FAC is Unopposed and Sustained with 15 days leave to Amend; Motion to Strike is Moot

Lan Lam v. Sabri Gurbuz

DEMURRER & MOTION TO STRIKE

Hearing date
Aug 12, 2026
Department
12
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffLan Lam
DefendantSabri Gurbuz

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 12 Honorable Nahal Iravani-Sani, Presiding Courtroom Clerk, Ryan Nguyen 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: (408) 882-2230

DATE: 08/12/2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. and 9:01 A.M.

LINE # CASE # CASE TITLE RULING LINE 1 23CV413944 Xiufeng Xie MOTION TO COMPEL v. Jane Doe; Simorphy Design and Investment, Please Ctrl click (or scroll down to) Line 1 et al. LINE 2 23CV416938 Bharat DePatel MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT/ADJUDICATION v. Dilip Patel et al Please Ctrl click (or scroll down to) Line 2

LINE 3 25CV456689 Richard Chamberlain MOTION TO COMPEL v. City of Campbell et al.

LINE 4 25CV464505 JP Morgan Chase Bank MOTION TO VACATE v. Holly Reyes Please Ctrl click (or scroll down to) Line 4 LINE 5 25CV467320 Thanh Trun Nguyen DEFAULT PROVE-UP V Phuong Anh Nguyen Continued to August 30, 2026 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 18 LINE 6 25CV474909 Brendan Patrick MOTION TO DISMISS McCloskey v. City of San Jose et al Please Ctrl click (or scroll down to) Line 6 LINE 7 25CV475239 Anusha Ramachandra MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS & DECLARATORY RELIEF v. Surakshith Narasegowda Please Ctrl click (or scroll down to) Line 7 LINE 8 26CV487361 Guideone Insurance Co PETITION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION & STAY PROCEEDINGS v. Quickbooks Online Payroll, Inc. Please Ctrl click (or scroll down to) Line 8 LINE 9 26CV491068 Lan Lam DEMURRER & MOTION TO STRIKE v. LINE 10 Sabri Gurbuz Demurrer to FAC is Unopposed and Sustained with 15 days leave to Amend; Motion to Strike is Moot

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share