DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV00984·santacruz·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
Hearing 12 days agoGRANTED

PASTORE v. GROW INDUSTRIES, LLC

RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT

Hearing date
Aug 12, 2026
Department
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffPASTORE
DefendantGROW INDUSTRIES, LLC

Ruling

LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: AUGUST 12, 2026 TIME: 8:30 A.M.

TENTATIVE RULINGS ARE NOT POSTED IN UNLAWFUL DETAINER CASES

Notice to prevailing parties: Local Rule 2.10.01 requires you to submit a proposed formal order incorporating, verbatim, the language of any tentative ruling – or attaching and incorporating the tentative by reference - or an order consistent with the announced ruling of the Court, in accordance with California Rule of Court 3.1312. Such proposed order is required even if the prevailing party submitted a proposed order prior to the hearing with two exceptions: (1) in unopposed matters where the moving party has provided a detailed proposed order or JCC form of order, or (2) where the tentative is simply to “grant”. Failure to comply with Local Rule 2.10.01 may result in the imposition of sanctions following an order to show cause hearing, if a proposed order is not timely filed.

No. 25CV00984

PASTORE v. GROW INDUSTRIES, LLC

(UNOPPOSED) RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT

The court intends to grant the unopposed motion. Respondent has demonstrated it had no knowledge of the action, the motion is timely, and the default was not caused by avoidance of service. (Code Civ. Proc., § 473.5, subd. (a), (c).) However, the parties should appear to update the court regarding plaintiff’s notice of conditional settlement, filed August 4, 2026.

No. 25CV01041

JORDON v. ASI CAPITOLA, INC., et al.

DEFENDANT ACCESSIBLE SPACE, INC.’S DEMURRER AND MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT

The demurrer is overruled. Defendant Accessible Space, Inc. has not complied with Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1113(b) by including “a statement of facts, a concise statement of the law, evidence and arguments relied on, and a discussion of the statutes, cases, and textbooks cited in support of the position advanced.” The demurrer fails to analyze any of the law cited to the facts at issue.

The motion to strike is denied.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share