DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25680366·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing 4 months agoDENIED

ZHEN QIANG ZHOU ET AL VS. JOHNNY GUOWEI ZHOU ET AL

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Hearing date
May 4, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Judgment rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffZHEN QIANG ZHOU
PlaintiffYU WU
DefendantJOHNNY GUOWEI ZHOU

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for May 4, 2026. Line 7.2. PLAINTIFF ZHEN ZHOU, TRUSTEE OF THE ZHOU/WU FAMILY TRUST DATED OCT. 30, 2014, YU WU MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT is DENIED.

Plaintiffs failed to shift their initial burden regarding exemption from the Tenant Protection Act of 2019. Plaintiffs offer no evidence or contention that they occupy the premises, an express requirement of the exemption under Civil Code 1946.2(e)(5). Plaintiffs offer no evidence or contention that they gave the written notice required for exemption under Civil Code 1946.2(e)(8). The plain language of Civil Code 1946.2(e)(8)(B)(ii)(I), which relaxes the methods by which the required notice may be provided for a tenancy existing before July 1, 2020, does not excuse the owner from providing the required notice at all. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share