Ortiz v. J.E.P. Capital, Inc., et al
Motion to Compel Further Responses to Form Interrogatories (Set One) from Philadelphia Consolidated Holdings Corp.
Motion type
Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →
Parties
Ruling
TENTATIVE RULING FOR August 3, 2026 Department R12 - Judge Kory Mathewson Ortiz v. J.E.P. Capital, Inc., et al – CIVSB2301598 Motion: Motion to Compel Further Responses to Form Interrogatories (Set One) from Philadelphia Consolidated Holdings Corp. Movant: Plaintiff Mynor Ortiz dba Atlantis Water Systems Respondent: Defendant U.S. Specialty Insurance Company Ruling: Motion to Compel Further Responses to Form Interrogatories (Set One) from Philadelphia Consolidated Holdings Corp. is GRANTED. Sanctions, to both parties, are DENIED. Plaintiff to provide Order and give notice. ______________________________________________________________________________
In light of the joint declaration filed on July 8, 2026, following the parties meet and confer, Plaintiff’s motion is granted. Defendant Philadelphia Consolidated Holding Corp. is ordered to provide supplemental responses pursuant to the parties’ agreement in the July 8, 2026 joint declaration. Both parties’ requests for sanctions are denied as not justified under the circumstances.
Dated: August 3, 2026
____________________________ Judge Kory Mathewson
TENTATIVE RULING FOR August 4, 2026 Department R12 - Judge Kory Mathewson Ortiz v. J.E.P. Capital, Inc., et al – CIVSB2301598 Motion: Motion to Compel Further Responses to Form Interrogatories (Set One) from U.S. Specialty Insurance Company Movant: Plaintiff Mynor Ortiz dba Atlantis Water Systems Respondent: Defendant U.S. Specialty Insurance Company Ruling: Motion to Compel Further Responses to Form Interrogatories (Set One) from U.S. Specialty Insurance Company is off calendar pursuant to the 7/8/26 joint declaration. Sanctions, as to both parties, are DENIED. Plaintiff to provide Order and give notice. ______________________________________________________________________________
In light of the joint declaration filed on July 8, 2026, following the parties meet and confer, U.S. Specialty is ordered to determine if supplemental responses are required given the definition of “incident” the parties have agreed to. Both parties’ requests for sanctions are denied as not justified under the circumstances.
Dated: August 4, 2026
____________________________ Judge Kory Mathewson
6
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”