DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
FPT-23-378122·sf·FamilyLaw·Contempt
Hearing about 1 month agoCONTINUED

DANTE SMITH v. CIARRA WALKER-SMITH

Order to Show Cause and Affidavit for Contempt

Hearing date
Jul 16, 2026
Department
403
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 27, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffDANTE SMITH
RespondentCIARRA WALKER-SMITH

Ruling

1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4

5) 6 DANTE SMITH,) Case Number: FPT-23-378122) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: July 16, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 CIARRA WALKER-SMITH,) Department: 403) 10 Respondent) Presiding: BOBBY P. LUNA) 11) 12 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND AFFIDAVIT FOR CONTEMPT 13 TENTATIVE RULING 14 Having read and considered the pleadings, declarations, and other evidence submitted in this matter, the 15 Court makes the following findings and orders: 16 A. Procedural History 17 1) The parties are Petitioner Dante Smith (Father) and Respondent Ciarra Walker-Smith (Mother). 18 2) On June 5, 2026, Mother filed an Order to Show Cause and Affidavit for Contempt alleging 5 19 counts of contempt committed by Father.

The matter is set for hearing on July 16, 2026. 20 3) As of July 9, 2026, no proof of personal service of the Order to Show Cause and Affidavit for 21 Contempt has been filed with the Court. 22 B. Findings and Order 23 1) Per Cedars-Sinai Imaging Medical Group v. Superior Court (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 1281, 24 personal service of Order to Show Cause and Affidavit for Contempt-on-contempt citee (i.e., 25 Father) is required. 26 2) As such, the matter is hereby continued to August 27, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 403 to 27 permit Mother to effectuate personal service on Father. 28 3) The Court will prepare the Findings and Order After Hearing. 29

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share