DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD24677030·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 4 months agoOFF CALENDAR

MISSION BAY 9 LP VS. TONY BALLARD ET AL

Motion For Entry Of Judgment For Possession Pursuant To The Parties' Stipulation

Hearing date
Apr 28, 2026
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMISSION BAY 9 LP
DefendantTONY BALLARD

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for April 28, 2026. Line 8.

PLAINTIFF MISSION BAY 9 LP Motion For Entry Of Judgment For Possession Pursuant To The Parties' Stipulation is OFF CALENDAR.

Defendant is represented limited scope in this action, and there is no substitution of attorney or order relieving Defendant's limited scope counsel on file. All papers in this case must therefore be served on both the Defendant and the Defendant's limited scope attorney. (CRC 3.36.) Proofs of service on file indicate the papers related to this motion were served on the Defendant only. The Court notes that while Plaintiff filed a reply in support of this motion, there is no opposition on file. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share