DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24617962·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 4 months agoGRANTED

CEPHEUS DAVIS ET AL VS. MISSION HOTEL, LLC ET AL

Notice Of Motion To Amend Operative Complaint To Substitute Successor-Ininterest For Deceased Plaintiff

Hearing date
Apr 28, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCEPHEUS DAVIS
PlaintiffQUINTON BUTTARS
PlaintiffQUINZO COLLINS
PlaintiffROGER BASSO
PlaintiffLISA COCHRAN
PlaintiffROBERT COCHRAN
DefendantMISSION HOTEL, LLC

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for April 28, 2026. Line 3. PLAINTIFF QUINTON BUTTARS, QUINZO COLLINS, ROGER BASSO, LISA COCHRAN, ROBERT COCHRAN Notice Of Motion To Amend Operative Complaint To Substitute Successor-Ininterest For Deceased Plaintiff is GRANTED. No opposition filed. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share