DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24-CIV-00280·sanmateo·Civil·Other
Hearing 13 days agoCONTINUED

INOCENCIO SANCHEZ VS. TERESA GODINEZ VIDRIO

DEFENDANT’S OBJECTIONS TO TENTATIVE DECISION AND PROPOSED STATEMENT OF DECISION

Hearing date
Aug 11, 2026
Department
4
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffINOCENCIO SANCHEZ
DefendantTERESA GODINEZ VIDRIO

Attorneys

MARIO FAUSTOfor Plaintiff
DYLAN HACKETTfor Defendant

Ruling

August 11, 2026 Law and Motion Calendar PAGE 18 Judge: HONORABLE NANCY L. FINEMAN, Department 04 ________________________________________________________________________

2:00 PM LINE 5 24-CIV-00280 INOCENCIO SANCHEZ VS. TERESA GODINEZ VIDRIO

INOCENCIO SANCHEZ MARIO FAUSTO TERESA GODINEZ VIDRIO DYLAN HACKETT

DEFENDANT’S OBJECTIONS TO TENTATIVE DECISION AND PROPOSED STATEMENT OF DECISION

TENTATIVE RULING:

Defendant has requested oral argument on this court’s tentative decision and proposed statement of decision. Therefore, the parties are to APPEAR. Zoom appearances are allowed.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share