DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25626190·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 4 months agoGRANTED

CINDY WAN SING CHOY VS. DAYID CHAK-SANG CHOY ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order On Stipulation

Hearing date
Apr 27, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCINDY WAN SING CHOY
DefendantDAYID CHAK-SANG CHOY
DefendantBANK OF AMERICA, N.A.

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for April 27, 2026. Line 5. DEFENDANT BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order On Stipulation is GRANTED. No opposition filed. The Court notes that this action is not pending in "County of Riverside" and that the Proof of Service contains a cumulative and incomplete sentence: "(BY PERSONAL DELIVERY, OVERNIGHT MAIL, FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION OR EMAIL) I served the following persons and/or entities by personal delivery, overnight mail service, of (for those who consented in writing to such service method, by facsimile transmission and/or email as follows:" Moving party to prepare and submit an order for execution. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share