DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25PR00268·sonoma·Probate·Guardianship
Hearing 20 days agoGuardianship terminated

In the Matter of Guardianship of Paras Khanna

Case Management Conference

Hearing date
Aug 4, 2026
Department
Unknown
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Ruling

4. Guardianship of Yonatan Alberto Perez Rivas 25PR00081 Case Management Conference

TENTATIVE RULING:

NO appearances required. The ward has reached the age of 18 and no further Guardianship Status Reports are required. The case is set for July 5, 2027, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 61 to address termination of the guardianship, as the ward will have reached the age of 21.

5. Guardianship of Jordan Mahanaim Borjas Rivas 25PR00082 Case Management Conference

TENTATIVE RULING:

NO appearances required. The ward has reached the age of 18 and no further Guardianship Status Reports are required. The case is set for April 6, 2027, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 61 to address termination of the guardianship, as the ward will have reached the age of 21.

6. Guardianship of Samuel Alfredo Escalante Ayala 25PR00116 Case Management Conference

TENTATIVE RULING:

NO appearances required. The ward has reached the age of 18 and no further Guardianship Status Reports are required. The case is set for July 3, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 61 to address termination of the guardianship, as the ward will have reached the age of 21.

7. Guardianship of Paras Khanna 25PR00268 Case Management Conference

TENTATIVE RULING:

NO appearances required. The ward reached the age of 21 on July 14, 2026, and as such the guardianship is terminated by operation of law.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share