DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC21596771·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 13 days agoCONTINUED

MHYF HOLDINGS, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY ET AL VS. CHRIS V. KELLY ET AL

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO File Fifth Amended Cross-Complaint

Hearing date
Aug 11, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 21, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMHYF HOLDINGS, LLC
DefendantCHRIS V. KELLY

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC21596771 - August 11, 2026 Hearing date: August 11, 2026 Case number: CGC21596771 Case title: MHYF HOLDINGS, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY ET AL VS. CHRIS V. KELLY ET AL Case Number: | | CGC21596771 | Case Title: | | MHYF HOLDINGS, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY ET AL VS. CHRIS V. KELLY ET AL |

Court Date: | | 2026-08-11 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR LEAVE TO File Fifth Amended Cross-Complaint | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for August 11, 2026. Line 2. Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Fifth Amended Cross-Complaint is continued to August 21, 2026 for Cal-Cade to provide a courtesy copy of their opposition no later than August 14, 2026 with a cover letter reflecting new hearing date. (Moving papers (x3), reply (x2) and Sutherby's opposition (x2) received). =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share