DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25623297·sf·Civil·Discovery Dispute
Hearing 13 days agoGRANTED

VIRGINIA LA MORENA DUMAGUIN ET AL VS. RAJESH NUNE ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Depositions Of Defendant Doordash, Inc.S Persons Most Knowledgeable And Production Of Documents; Request For Monetary Sanctions

Hearing date
Aug 11, 2026
Department
301
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$3,150.00

Parties

PlaintiffVIRGINIA LA MORENA DUMAGUIN
PlaintiffMARY BENESA
PlaintiffRUSSELL DUMAGUIN
DefendantRAJESH NUNE
DefendantDOORDASH, INC.

Ruling

Matter on the Law & Motion and Discovery Calendar for Tuesday, August 11, 2026, Line 39, PLAINTIFF VIRGINIA DUMAGUIN INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO THE INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO THE DUMAGUIN, MARY BENESA, RUSSELL DUMAGUIN's Motion To Compel Depositions Of Defendant Doordash, Inc.'s Persons Most Knowledgeable And Production Of Documents.

DoorDash shall produce its PMK for deposition on August 13, 2026. The parties shall comply with their meet and confer agreement with respect to document demands as set out in Plaintiff's supplemental opposition brief at page 4, lines 13-19. The court has signed the parties' stipulated protective order.

For disputed areas, DoorDash's production is limited to California for the period 2019 to the present. Plaintiff does not show good cause for a broader search at this time. DoorDash shall provide the identities of its PMKs and the topics each will cover forthwith. The court orders production within 10 days of this order. DoorDash must provide a privilege log with its production. Plaintiff may elect to reschedule the deposition to coincide with the production.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/CVA) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share