DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC26277403·sf·Civil·Asbestos Litigation
Hearing 13 days agoDENIED

JEREMY VOGLER ET AL VS. MERCK & CO., INC. ET AL

MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS OR STAY OR DISMISS

Hearing date
Aug 11, 2026
Department
502
Prevailing
Opposing Party

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Quash rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJEREMY VOGLER
DefendantMERCK & CO., INC.
DefendantSPECIALTY MINERALS INC.
DefendantMINERAL TECHNOLOGIES INC.

Ruling

On Asbestos Law and Motion / Discovery Calendar for Tuesday, August 11, 2026, Department 502, Line 1.

1. DEFENDANT MINERALS TECHNOLOGIES INC.'S MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS OR STAY OR DISMISS. Specially Appearing Defendants Specialty Minerals Inc's ("SMI") and Mineral Technologies Inc's ("MTI") Motions to Quash Service of Summons for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction are DENIED. Oppositions Filed. Replies Filed. (The Court's complete tentative ruling was e-served to the parties. Please see Transaction No. 80293398.) The moving pary shall lodge with the clerk in Department 502 by the time set for this hearing a proposed order repeating verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling.

Any party wishing to contest the tentative ruling must email contestasbestostr@sftc.org by 4:00 p.m. on the day before the hearing and state their intention to contest. If a hearing is requested, it will be on August 11, 2026, at 4:00 p.m in Department 502. Attorneys may appear in person or remotely via zoom: Meeting ID 161 9575 2444; Passcode: 145616. The Court no longer provides a court reporter. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. If a California certified court reporter (CSR) is being retained, include in your email all of the following: Their name, CSR and telephone number, and their individual work email address.

There will be only one official record. =(502/SKF) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share