DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV444721·santaclara·Civil·Debt Collection
Hearing 13 days agoGRANTED

Truist Bank, in Successor by Merger to SunTrust Bank, d/b/a Lightstream v. Eric Skavdahl

Plaintiff Truist Bank’s motion to enter judgment by stipulation

Hearing date
Aug 11, 2026
Department
10
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Monetary amounts referenced

$9,583.28$453.95

Parties

PlaintiffTruist Bank
DefendantEric Skavdahl

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 10 Honorable Jeffrey B. El-Hajj Blanca Than, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408-882-2210

DATE: August 11, 2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. / 9:01 A.M. To contest the ruling, you must call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. You must also contact the other side before 4:00 P.M. to inform them that you plan to contest the ruling. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1); Local Rule 8.D.)

**Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and counsel**

Line 5 24CV444721 Truist Bank, in Plaintiff Truist Bank’s motion to enter judgment by stipulation. (Code Civ. Successor by Proc., § 664.6.) Notice is proper and the motion is unopposed. The parties Merger to signed a stipulation for entry of judgment in 2024, under which defendant SunTrust Bank, Eric Skavdahl agreed to make installment payments to pay off a debt. A d/b/a declaration in support of the motion indicates defendant stopped making Lightstream v. payments. On good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED. Moving party Eric Skavdahl to submit proposed order and proposed judgment, indicating damages of $9,583.28 and costs of $453.95.

3

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share