DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD22670457·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 4 months agoSUSTAINED with leave to amend

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. AS TRUSTEE FOR HARBORVIEW VS. ANGIE ROYCE CHEATHAM-SANDERS ET AL

DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Apr 22, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffWELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. AS TRUSTEE FOR HARBORVIEW
DefendantANGIE ROYCE CHEATHAM-SANDERS
DefendantKEVIN WHITE

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for April 22, 2026. Line 4.

DEFENDANT KEVIN WHITE DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT is SUSTAINED with leave to amend within 5 days of notice of entry of order for Plaintiff to allege Defendant White's interest in or relationship to the premises such that Plaintiff can proceed against him pursuant to this action based on CCP 1161a.

As to Defendant White, the Second Amended Complaint alleges only that he is currently in possession of the premises. This is not a sufficient factual basis to support Plaintiff's cause of action against Defendant White. Plaintiff is granted leave to amend to include similar allegations as to any other defendants in this action as well. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share