DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25622950·sf·Civil·Discovery Dispute
Hearing 4 months agoOff calendar. Notice of settlement of entire case filed on 4/9/26.

LIU YANG VS. AL HARIRI ET AL

Notice Of Motion To Compel Further Responses To Special Interrogatories Nos. 1-67, Request For Production Of Documents Nos. 1-26, And Form Interrogatories, Nos. 1-2.13, 3.6, 3.7, 4-14.2, 17.1, 50.1-50.6 Against Plaintiff Wegrow School California; Request For Monetary Sanctions

Hearing date
Apr 22, 2026
Department
302
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffLIU YANG
DefendantAL HARIRI
PlaintiffWegrow School California

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 302 - CGC25622950 - April 22, 2026 Hearing date: April 22, 2026 Case number: CGC25622950 Case title: LIU YANG VS. AL HARIRI ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25622950 | Case Title: | | LIU YANG VS. AL HARIRI ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-04-22 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion To Compel Further Responses To Special Interrogatories Nos. 1-67, Request For Production Of Documents Nos. 1-26, And Form Interrogatories, Nos. 1-2.13, 3.6, 3.7, 4-14.2, 17.1, 50.1-50.6 Against Plaintiff Wegrow School California; Request For Monetary Sanctions | Rulings: | | Set for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Wednesday, April 22, 2026, Line 6. 2 - DEFENDANT AL HARIRI's Motion To Compel Further Responses To Special Interrogatories Nos. 1-67, Request For Production Of Documents Nos. 1-26, And Form Interrogatories, Nos. 1-2.13, 3.6, 3.7, 4-14.2, 17.1, 50.1-50.6 Against Plaintiff Wegrow School California; Request For Monetary Sanctions.

Off calendar. Notice of settlement of entire case filed on 4/9/26. =(302/REQ) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share