DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC23277095·sf·Civil·Asbestos
Hearing 4 months agoDENIED

SONJA BUCKETT ET AL VS. CONSOLIDATED INSULATION, INC. ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Continue Trial Date

Hearing date
Apr 21, 2026
Department
304
Judge
Prevailing
Opposing Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSONJA BUCKETT
DefendantCONSOLIDATED INSULATION, INC.
DefendantUNIFRAX LLC

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Asbestos Law & Motion - CGC23277095 - April 21, 2026 Hearing date: April 21, 2026 Case number: CGC23277095 Case title: SONJA BUCKETT ET AL VS. CONSOLIDATED INSULATION, INC. ET AL Case Number: | | CGC23277095 | Case Title: | | SONJA BUCKETT ET AL VS. CONSOLIDATED INSULATION, INC. ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-04-21 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Continue Trial Date | Rulings: | | On Asbestos Law and Motion Calendar for Tuesday April 21, 2026, in Department 304, Line 1 Defendant Unifrax LLC's ("Defendant" or "Unifrax") Motion to Continue Trial Date is DENIED. Opposition filed. Reply filed.

*Complete tentative ruling has been electronically served to Counsel (TRANSACTION ID # 79080375). Any party wishing to contest the tentative ruling must email contestasbestostr@sftc.org by 4:00 p.m. on the day before the hearing and state their intention to contest. If a hearing is requested, it will be on April 21, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. Attorneys may appear in person or remotely via zoom: Meeting ID 160 757 8308; Passcode: 485029. Face coverings are optional.

The Court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law and Motion department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: Their name, CSR and telephone number, and their individual work email address. There will be only one official record. If the parties cannot agree, the Court will designate a qualified court reporter to provide the official transcript for the matter, and the party or parties will bear the cost. = (304/EPS). | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share