| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Notice Of Motion And Motion To Continue Trial Date
SF Superior Court - Asbestos Law & Motion - CGC23277095 - April 21, 2026 Hearing date: April 21, 2026 Case number: CGC23277095 Case title: SONJA BUCKETT ET AL VS. CONSOLIDATED INSULATION, INC. ET AL Case Number: | | CGC23277095 | Case Title: | | SONJA BUCKETT ET AL VS. CONSOLIDATED INSULATION, INC. ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-04-21 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Continue Trial Date | Rulings: | | On Asbestos Law and Motion Calendar for Tuesday April 21, 2026, in Department 304, Line 1 Defendant Unifrax LLC's ("Defendant" or "Unifrax") Motion to Continue Trial Date is DENIED. Opposition filed. Reply filed.
*Complete tentative ruling has been electronically served to Counsel (TRANSACTION ID # 79080375). Any party wishing to contest the tentative ruling must email contestasbestostr@sftc.org by 4:00 p.m. on the day before the hearing and state their intention to contest. If a hearing is requested, it will be on April 21, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. Attorneys may appear in person or remotely via zoom: Meeting ID 160 757 8308; Passcode: 485029. Face coverings are optional.
The Court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law and Motion department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: Their name, CSR and telephone number, and their individual work email address. There will be only one official record. If the parties cannot agree, the Court will designate a qualified court reporter to provide the official transcript for the matter, and the party or parties will bear the cost. = (304/EPS). | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”