| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Motion For Entry Of Judgment For Monetary Damages Pursuant To Stipulation
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25679377 - April 20, 2026 Hearing date: April 20, 2026 Case number: CUD25679377 Case title: LBF YERBA BUENA, LLC VS. LANCE ROBERTSON ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25679377 | Case Title: | | LBF YERBA BUENA, LLC VS. LANCE ROBERTSON ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-04-20 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion For Entry Of Judgment For Monetary Damages Pursuant To Stipulation | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for April 20, 2026. Line 9.
Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Judgment for Monetary Damages Pursuant to Stipulation is GRANTED in part. A judgment for monetary damages shall enter in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant Lance Robertson in the amount of $35,000. This action is filed in limited jurisdiction. There is no discussion in Plaintiff's motion of why Plaintiff believes the Court has authority to enter a monetary judgment in excess of the jurisdictional limit. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”