DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26PG-0033289·shasta·Probate·Guardianship
Hearing 14 days agoCONTINUED

In the Matter of Christian, Bella & Angel Bevis

Petition for Visitation

Hearing date
Aug 10, 2026
Department
42
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Sep 28, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerThomas Bevis

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 26PG-0033289 Disclosure Re: guardianship cases involving Shasta County Health and Human Services Agency-Judge Wood discloses that her step-daughter, Erinn Watts, is the Administrative Branch Director of the Health and Human Services Agency. In that position, Judge Wood’s step-daughter does not have any involvement in the investigation, management, prosecution or defense of guardianship cases. However, the Court makes this disclosure of an employment relationship between an investigating agency and the Court’s first degree relative as required by California Code of Judicial Ethics.

This matter is on calendar for hearing on a Petition for Visitation filed by the father, Thomas Bevis. Proof of service for the temporary guardians has been filed, however service was untimely. The Court notes this matter is on calendar for hearing on all pending petitions for guardianship on August 14, 2026. The Court will address visitation after the pending petitions have been resolved. The matter is continued to Monday, September 28, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Department 42 for further proceedings on the Petition. The father is required to file and serve a new Notice of Hearing for the continued hearing date, along with a copy of the Petition, on all guardians of the minor children. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

GUARDIANSHIP OF LANDON DODD

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share