DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24PG-0032442·shasta·Probate·Guardianship
Hearing 14 days agoCONTINUED

In the Matter of Zeleyana Ray Sims

Order to Show Cause Re: Termination of Guardianship; Petition for Appointment of Successor Guardian; Petition for Termination of Guardianship

Hearing date
Aug 10, 2026
Department
42
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Sep 28, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerElizabeth Houck
PetitionerEugene Sims

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 24PG-0032442 Disclosure Re: guardianship cases involving Shasta County Health and Human Services Agency-Judge Wood discloses that her step-daughter, Erinn Watts, is the Administrative Branch Director of the Health and Human Services Agency. In that position, Judge Wood’s step-daughter does not have any involvement in the investigation, management, prosecution or defense of guardianship cases. However, the Court makes this disclosure of an employment relationship between an investigating agency and the Court’s first degree relative as required by California Code of Judicial Ethics.

This matter is on calendar for further proceedings on an Order to Show Cause Re: Termination of Guardianship. This matter is also on calendar for further proceedings on a Petition for Appointment of Successor Guardian of the Person. The Petition was filed by the minor’s cousin, Elizabeth Houck. Letters of Temporary Guardianship issued on March 10, 2026, and are set to expire today unless further extended. The current Guardian is Shannon Ray.

A new Notice of Hearing has not been filed and served for today’s date. There is no proof of service of the Notice of Hearing and Petition for the mother, guardian/maternal grandmother, or siblings and insufficient information has been provided to permit the Court to dispense with notice. The Court has reviewed the Court Investigator’s report filed on April 2, 2026, which recommends granting the Petition.

This matter is also on calendar for hearing on a Petition for Termination of Guardianship filed by the father, Eugene Sims. The minor, temporary guardian, and guardian/maternal grandmother have consented to termination of the guardianship and waived notice. The Court dispenses with notice to the deceased paternal grandfather. There is no proof of service of the Notice of Hearing and Petition for the mother, maternal grandfather, paternal grandmother, or siblings. Insufficient

information has been provided to permit the Court to dispense with notice to these parties. All parties may be served by mail. The Court has reviewed the Court Investigator’s report filed on July 28, 2026, which recommends granting the Petition. The report indicates that the minor and father are currently living with the temporary guardian and that father is working on securing housing. While it is apparent that the temporary guardian is no longer pursuing her Petition, under the circumstances the Court will continue the temporary guardianship until the Petition for Termination of Guardianship can be properly noticed.

This matter is continued to Monday, September 28, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Department 42 for further proceedings on the Petition for Appointment of Successor Guardian of the Person and Petition for Termination of Guardianship. The Temporary Guardianship is ORDERED to remain in effect until the continued hearing date. The father is required to file and serve a new Notice of Hearing for the continued hearing date, along with a copy of the Petition for Termination of Guardianship, on the parties identified above.

In the alternative, if the father cannot serve the parties identified, the Court will require a declaration explaining in detail all efforts of the father to locate and serve them and why they cannot be served, to permit the Court to dispense with notice. Warning: Failure to properly effect service or provide adequate basis to dispense with service as to the necessary parties will result in denial of the Petition. Notice is preserved. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

GUARDIANSHIP OF SAYLOR & RIVER ROBINSON AND WILLOW HAGER

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share