Keri Cicolani v. Daniel LáZaro-Cuadrado
Motion to be Relieved as Counsel
Motion type
Parties
Attorneys
Ruling
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4
5) 6 KERI CICOLANI,) Case Number: FPT-25-378759) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: July 7, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 DANIEL LáZARO-CUADRADO,) Department: 404) 10 Respondent) Presiding: AI MORI) 11) 12 MC-051 - NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL - CIVIL 13 TENTATIVE RULING 14 Having read and considered the pleadings, declarations, and other evidence submitted in this matter, the 15 Court makes the following findings and orders: 16 1) On for hearing is Petitioner Keri Cicolani’s former attorney Katie’ Burke’s Motion to be Relieved as 17 Counsel filed 4/30/2026. 18 2) On 5/18/2026, a Substitution of Attorney was filed wherein attorney Anne Fokstuen substituted in as 19 Petitioner’s attorney of record and Ms.
Burke substituted out. 20 3) The Court finds that Ms. Burke’s Motion to be Relieved as Counsel is moot and the Court makes no 21 further orders on this issue. 22 4) The Court will prepare the Findings and Order After Hearing. 23
27
29
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”