DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
FPT-25-378759·sf·FamilyLaw·Family Law
Hearing about 2 months agoMOOT

Keri Cicolani v. Daniel LáZaro-Cuadrado

Motion to be Relieved as Counsel

Hearing date
Jul 7, 2026
Department
404
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerKeri Cicolani
RespondentDaniel LáZaro-Cuadrado

Attorneys

Katie Burkefor Petitioner
Anne Fokstuenfor Petitioner

Ruling

1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4

5) 6 KERI CICOLANI,) Case Number: FPT-25-378759) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: July 7, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 DANIEL LáZARO-CUADRADO,) Department: 404) 10 Respondent) Presiding: AI MORI) 11) 12 MC-051 - NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL - CIVIL 13 TENTATIVE RULING 14 Having read and considered the pleadings, declarations, and other evidence submitted in this matter, the 15 Court makes the following findings and orders: 16 1) On for hearing is Petitioner Keri Cicolani’s former attorney Katie’ Burke’s Motion to be Relieved as 17 Counsel filed 4/30/2026. 18 2) On 5/18/2026, a Substitution of Attorney was filed wherein attorney Anne Fokstuen substituted in as 19 Petitioner’s attorney of record and Ms.

Burke substituted out. 20 3) The Court finds that Ms. Burke’s Motion to be Relieved as Counsel is moot and the Court makes no 21 further orders on this issue. 22 4) The Court will prepare the Findings and Order After Hearing. 23

27

29

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share