DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24612227·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing 5 months agoCONTINUED

HONG ZHENG ET AL VS. GLENN FAMA ET AL

MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION

Hearing date
Apr 10, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
May 15, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Adjudication rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffHONG ZHENG
PlaintiffTHE MACRO ROJO TRUST
PlaintiffHONG XIAO
DefendantGLENN FAMA

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for April 10, 2026. Line 3. PLAINTIFF HONG ZHENG, AS AN INDIVIDUAL AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE MACRO ROJO TRUST, HONG XIAO MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION. is continued to May 15, 2026 for opposing party to prepare and file a response to separate statement compliant with CRC 3.1350. Amended response shall be filed no later than April 17, 2026. Plaintiff may file an amended reply, if necessary, in light of the amended response to the separate statement no later than May 1, 2026. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share