DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25680787·sf·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
Hearing 5 months agoOFF CALENDAR

UC COLLEGE OF THE LAW, SAN FRANCISCO VS. MARISSA MITCHELL ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Cconversion Of Action From Unlawful Detainer To General Civil

Hearing date
Apr 7, 2026
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffUC COLLEGE OF THE LAW, SAN FRANCISCO
DefendantMARISSA MITCHELL

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for April 7, 2026. Line 9. PLAINTIFF UC COLLEGE OF THE LAW, SAN FRANCISCO Notice Of Motion And Motion For Cconversion Of Action From Unlawful Detainer To General Civil is OFF CALENDAR. No proof of proper service. Proof of service on file attests to service of the moving papers by overnight mail addressed to Defendant to each of two addresses, neither of which is Defendant's mailing address as identified on her Notice of Change of Address filed and served on January 2, 2026, which is her current address of record in this action. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share