JENNIFER SARKANY ET AL VS. CHRISTIE WEST ET AL

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC18571355 - April 3, 2026 Hearing date: April 3, 2026 Case number: CGC18571355 Case title: JENNIFER SARKANY ET AL VS. CHRISTIE WEST ET AL Case Number: | | CGC18571355 | Case Title: | | JENNIFER SARKANY ET AL VS. CHRISTIE WEST ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-04-03 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Plaintiffs Motion To Confirm Defendant Christie Wests Ownership Of 1215 29th Avenue San Francisco | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for April 3, 2026. Line 2. PLAINTIFF JENNIFER SARKANY, RAMSEY ABOUREMELEH, SANDRA FIERRO, NINA ROBINS Notice Of Motion And Plaintiffs Motion To Confirm Defendant Christie Wests Ownership Of 1215 29th Avenue San Francisco is DENIED.

The Court made its rulings regarding ownership of the property in the orders entered on February 3, 2026. Plaintiffs had moved "for an order permitting the sale of a dwelling owned by the judgment debtors, Christie West and Timothy West." No evidence or argument was presented by the Plaintiffs that the property (1215 29th Ave, SF, CA) was owned by both Christie West and Timothy West at the same time. Thus, the property could be owned by Ms. West or Mr. West notwithstanding the use of "and" by the Plaintiff in the motion.

The only undisputed evidence as to the ownership of the Property as of the time of the request for sale was (1) the recorded title reflecting Mr. West's ownership; and (2) Mr. West's admission of ownership. Additionally, Plaintiffs expressly stated that as Plaintiffs have a judgment against Mr. West, the sale is proper as to him. In other words, by seeking a sale of the property to satisfy Mr. West's debt, Plaintiffs conceded his ownership; otherwise a request to sell property that does not belong to the judgment debtor to satisfy a debt would be frivolous and not supported by any law cited in the Application for Sale of Dwelling. Therefore, having Plaintiffs' concession of ownership as reflected by the filing of the Application for Sale of Dwelling to satisfy Mr. West's debt, recorded title, and admission of current ownership by Mr. West, the Court issued its February 3, 2026 orders.

To the extent Plaintiff may be seeking a reconsideration of the Court's February 3, 2026 orders, the Court makes no determination of the validity of such motion as it is not properly before the Court. To the extent Plaintiff relies on the language in the February 4, 2020 judgement for res judicata/collateral estoppel re: Ms. West's ownership, Plaintiffs failed to establish its applicability. (Language purportedly adjudicating Christie West's ownership per supplemental declaration filed on March 27, 2026: "The jury awarded punitive damages in favor of Plaintiff Nina Robin and as against Defendant Christie West in the amount of $15,000. The jury awarded punitive damages in favor of Plaintiff Nina Robin and as against Defendant Timothy West in the amount of $5,000.")

As to the March 27, 2026 Supplemental Hooshmand Declaration, it is stricken (except for paragraphs 1, 2 and the first sentence of paragraph 3) as unauthorized. March 31, 2026 Declaration of Christie West is stricken. The filing was not authorized. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |