DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV000234·napa·Civil·Contract
Hearing 25 days agoCONTINUED

Creditors Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Rodrigo Barrera Lara et al

MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF’S DEMAND FOR IDENTIFICATION, PRODUCTION, INSPECTION AND COPYING OF DOCUMENTS AND OTHER TANGIBLE THINGS; REQUEST FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS; MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST SET OF SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES; REQUEST FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS

Hearing date
Jul 30, 2026
Department
3
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 13, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCreditors Adjustment Bureau, Inc.
DefendantRodrigo Barrera Lara
DefendantGeneral Contractor Inc.

Ruling

CIVIL CALENDAR – Hon. Joseph J. Solga, Dept. 3 (Criminal Courts Bldg.) at 8:30 a.m.

Creditors Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Rodrigo Barrera Lara et al 26CV000234

[1] MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF’S DEMAND FOR IDENTIFICATION, PRODUCTION, INSPECTION AND COPYING OF DOCUMENTS AND OTHER TANGIBLE THINGS; REQUEST FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS [as to Defendant Rodrigo Barrera Lara]

[2] MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST SET OF SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES; REQUEST FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS [as to Defendant Rodrigo Barrera Lara]

[3] MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF’S DEMAND FOR IDENTIFICATION, PRODUCTION INSPECTION AND COPYING OF DOCUMENTS AND OTHER TANGIBLE THINGS; REQUEST FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS [as to Defendant General Contractor Inc.]

[4] MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST SET OF SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES; REQUEST FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS [as to Defendant General Contractor Inc.]

TENTATIVE RULING: Due to constraints on the Court’s judicial resources beyond its control, all four motions are CONTINUED to August 13, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. B. The Case Management Conference on July 30, 2026, is also CONTINUED to August 13, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. B.

PROBATE CALENDAR – Hon. Cynthia P. Smith, Dept. A (Historic Courthouse) at 8:30 a.m.

Conservatorship of Akela Nang Xayasounthone 23PR000111

REVIEW HEARING

TENTATIVE RULING: After a review of the matter, the Court finds the Conservators are acting in the best interest of the Conservatee. Thus, the case is set for a Review - Biennial hearing in two years, on July 28, 2028, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. B. The Court Investigator shall prepare a biennial investigator report for the next hearing date. The Clerk is directed to send notice to the parties.

2

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share