DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
FL0002022·marin·FamilyLaw·Family Law
Hearing 18 days ago

Caitlin Rains Collilcott and Nathaniel Collicott

Hearing date
Aug 6, 2026
Department
E
Prevailing
N/A

Parties

PlaintiffCaitlin Rains Collilcott
DefendantNathaniel Collicott

Ruling

Tentative Rulings Judge Beth A. Jordan Department E

Any party who disagrees with the Court's tentative ruling and wishes to have oral argument must notify the Court at (415) 444-7046 and opposing counsel (or if the opposing party is self represented, notice must be given directly to the opposing party) of their intent to appear at the hearing for oral argument by 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing, as required by Marin County Superior Court Family Law Local Rules 7.12(B) and (C). Notice may be given by telephone or in person. Absent proper notice, no oral argument will be permitted.

If no request for oral argument is made, the tentative ruling will become the order of the Court. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, persons who requested oral argument must appear for the hearing in person or remotely via Zoom, in accordance with the Court website guidelines. If appearing remotely via Zoom (video or telephone), you are responsible for ensuring you have adequate connectivity; the Court may proceed in a party’s absence if technical issues arise. Proper Zoom etiquette and courtroom decorum are required, and failure to comply may result in the hearing being halted and an order to appear in person being made.

Tentative Rulings for the following cases will be emailed to the parties. If you have not received the Tentative Ruling, please call (415) 444-7260 or reach out to JudicialSupport@marin.courts.ca.gov.

In addition, copies of the Tentative Rules will be provided either electronically or in paper at the courthouse in Clerk’s Of’ice (Room 113), Legal Self-Help or Court Administration (Room 116).

FL 2203175 Pierre-Olivier Latour and Nooshin Latour FL0002022 Caitlin Rains Collilcott and Nathaniel Collicott FL0002941 Michael Pinkhan and Amber Hines

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share