DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25623255·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 5 months agoOFF CALENDAR

ALEX ANDRADE ET AL VS. KNOX SRO LLC ET AL

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL FOR PLAINITFF ANGEL LIU

Hearing date
Mar 27, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffALEX ANDRADE
PlaintiffANGEL LIU
DefendantKNOX SRO LLC

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for March 27, 2026. Line 4. NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL FOR PLAINITFF ANGEL LIU is OFF CALENDAR. No valid proof of service on file as to Angel Liu. Proof of service purports to attest to e-service on unspecified date. No e-mail address for Angel Liu listed, just a mailing address. Attorney declaration in support of the motion refers to service by mail on Angel Liu, but there is no proof of service by mail. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share